this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
181 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2003 readers
1334 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is one of those things where I'm torn between "there's no way the cabal of competent capitalists running this entire circus would ever allow this because a bank run would destroy the mountain of fictitious capital that is their dragon's hoard" and "oh fuck, I'm not sure any of the cabal of capitalists that run this circus are competent anymore, they might actually do it."

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at it this way, if they wreck the economy, then at least we know if the power brokers are still competent or not, and who is whose figurehead. It would answer so many questions.

I’m just not willing to pay the price for such knowledge

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

if they wreck the economy

🙂

[–] SineSwiper@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If it's in a bank, that's peasants' money, not the stock options and real estate and foreign accounts and Bitcoin investments and the other thousands of ways the capitalists hide money.

And why wouldn't they cause another bubble to pop that the government would be forced to bail them out of?

The bank's money is the capitalists' money; that's what they're loaning out to each other and investing into stocks. A mass bank run would run through Wall Street like a wildfire.

And the FDIC is the government bailing them out, that's the entire point of insuring money in bank accounts.