this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)

Selfhosted

61808 readers
619 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
32
[HELP] Migrating away from Android Password Store (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Looking to migrate away from APS as it is no longer in active development.
I need a solution that will still enable me to add/remove/change passwords from an Android device, a Linux device, and have all changes sync-up. (In GNU-pass-based APS, it's achieved by a git repo that saves passwords as gpg encrypted files) Preferably, I want it to still be self hosted, F-Droidable, and maybe a migration guide or tool to ease the transition.

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wut?

[–] keyez@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well yes, I run my own, as does everyone else questioning your response. The $20 is throwing everyone without context. We can only assume you mean hosting costs.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was responding to a comment about bitwarden being paid while vaultwarden is self hosted. I've been self hosting bitwarden for years and pay $20 a year for the subscription to do so and support them. Is the self hosted option not paid like the comment I replied to says?

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

OK, there's the context. "I self-host BitWarden and pay for an individual license to get extra features and support them."

All for that: Finance FOSS! That bring said, Comment OP didn't say you couldn't self-host BitWarden, but I understand the response now. Vaultwarden is just so much easier to self-host, though.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The way it is written was like only vault warden is self host able and usually VW is mentioned more in forums when the actual official stack that gets regular updates and security reviews is available to host so I always like to point that out so more people use it instead of the knock off though it does have it's use cases.