1256
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frunch@lemmy.world 77 points 2 weeks ago

Can we though? Are you thinking of the shareholders at all?!? Someone's going to have a tough time having only 4 holiday homes to choose from... 😬

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

JUST 4? ARE YOU INSANE?

First of all two of those are under a cold front right now, and one of them is having maintenance done in the West courtyard (noisy from 3pm-3:30pm if you are within 6 bedrooms of it, which I assure you, we won't be) and the fourth one we were just at 2 years ago so it's a little much to vacation there again that soon.

Please think before you speak.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

My apologies and condolences for any tribulations my thoughtfulness may have bestowed upon you. In my haste to protect my interests and that of my colleagues, i spoke before fully considering the gravity of my statements 🫠

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

My people will contact your people for an appropriate settlement.

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

Generally the only thing I think about shareholders is feeding them into a grinder feet first.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

As a shareholder I can tell you the ones you could have reason for sending to the guillotine are mostly companies

Only the very worst of the super wealthy investors and the companies are pressing for maximum income now which is what wrecks and/or enshittifies businesses

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com -5 points 2 weeks ago

It's the NYC Subway. It's not a company, it's government mass transit. They had big problems with homeless people harassing people and the cops weren't doing much. Ridership was dropping. So they did the only thing they could do.

It sucks, but what do you expect from the subway? A solution to homeless people? It's for getting people to where they want to go, not for being a shelter.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Keep the benches, and pressure the system to help house and treat the underlying issues of homelessness.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

New York City already provides shelter space for anyone who asks. It's the city's obligation according to the state constitution. (This is one reason why so many migrants came to NYC.) The homeless people in the subway system generally don't want to go to a shelter.

As for treating the underlying issues: many of these people are either schizophrenics or drug addicts. There's no straightforward treatment for either condition.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Guess that solves it, then. Good chat.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

There are solutions, for example arms between seating positions to make laying down impossible; sharp fins between seating positions to make laying down uncomfortable

These are common worldwide

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago

Taking Benches away is LITERALLY the ONLY Option! How can you Expect Police Officers to do anything when there's FARE JUMPERS that need to be SHOT!

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
1256 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

6015 readers
1509 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS