this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
835 points (96.2% liked)

World News

36679 readers
752 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago (40 children)

I was under the impression the research showed that there was a risk but you needed to consume an exorbitant amount to get there. Around 20+ cans of coke a day which the majority of people don’t do.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)

Around 20+ cans of coke a day which the majority of people don’t do.

This guy has never met an American. Ever heard of a Big Gulp? We literally had private companies engineer bigger soda cups to handle how much fucking soda Americans drink.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We literally had private companies engineer bigger soda cups to handle how much fucking soda Americans drink.

This is a really weird statement. Like it was some sort of feat of engineering to manufacture larger cups.

[–] FoxAndKitten@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not a feat of engineering, a feat of marketing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)