228
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago

If America hadn't responded to Chernobyl with fear of atomic power and instead adopted a "this is why communism will fail, look how much better we can do it" attitude, the climate crisis would be a non-issue right now

[-] oyo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

As an engineer, Chernobyl is terrifying. It was close to being 10x worse than it was. The thought that capitalism could do it better is the height of hubris. If you think your technology is fail-safe, nature (including humans) will find a better way to fail.

There are many reasons besides safety that nuclear makes no sense. Others have listed them here. But this recent hand-waving away of safety is frightening. Saying that our technology today is so much better while anti-intellectualism is running rampant. Saying facilities could always be staffed by experts while our political system is more unstable than ever. Thinking that we could store waste for 10,000 years when humanity has never built something that has intentionally survived a fraction of that time.

The downside of this equation is just too severe. Nuclear plants are uninsurable for a reason, and by default are insured by the public. That cost is ignored in the equation, because it's too large for even the biggest insurance conglomerates to consider.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Don't forget about three mile island. I think much spin on the Chernobyl situation can be attributed to the embarrassment of the self failure

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Threee mile island was only a partial meltdown, and very little fission product was ever released to the environment. Nowhere near as blatant and drastic of a failure as what happened in Chernobyl.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 3 weeks ago

True, however it was embarrassing to the atomic lobby. It was very similar in his a little lack of oversight caused a huge crisis.

The scale of the repercussions was very different, yes and that was emphasized to put the three mile incident in a better light.

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 3 weeks ago

Because we were determined to phase out fossil fuels at the time?

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
228 points (91.0% liked)

World News

39333 readers
2943 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS