Greentext

6740 readers

1198 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

302

Anon tries to manipulate Tinder (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 8 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Like when they discriminated against users because of their age...

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Gaetz: flips table

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

A quick Google shows that they charged over thirties in the UK double for a premium account.

Devils advocate says that is because older people are more like to have money (people are probably getting a bit more desperate at that age too).

It looks like the policy is revoked tho.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We should charge people based on their ability to pay for food too!

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We do it for taxes and in my opinion, it doesn't go far enough.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 7 months ago

We really don't... It is progressive only for people who work for money 🤡 up to few hundred k

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 2 points 7 months ago

They still do that, and it's no secret.