this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32318 readers
406 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's basically how I've felt about it. If you're getting too much sugar from drinking soda, the correct response is to drink less soda - not substitute the sugar with something that tricks your body into thinking it's sweet.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But this ignores that people want to drink soda, and sugar-free soda lets them do that while also not consuming vast vast vast amounts of pointless calories.

You have to balance enjoyment with health, not doing so is why most diets fail, if you force yourself into a healthy diet that makes you sad you will almost inevitably end up falling back to the junk food because it makes you happy.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People want to eat lots of fat, sugary foods but that doesn't mean they should.

Certainly, it's about balancing enjoyment with health. However I think it's important to listen to what your body is telling you, when it's telling you you're having too much of something.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly not sure what your point is here, you seem to have ignored my argument and replied with a non-sequiteur.

Yeah, people should listen to their bodies, and their bodies say that they want to drink soda.
Now, is it better to drink soda with a shitload of calories, or soda with like 3 calories?

Most people have not trained themselves to pull off intuitive eating and thus their bodies just crave fats and carbs, so the best thing to do to improve their diet is to satisfy those cravings while consuming fewer calories.

This then provides an excellent motivation to re-calibrate your cravings as you realize that it is, in fact, possible to eat healthily without being miserable.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

The body isn't saying it wants soda. There is no drive from the body for soda. The body might want sugar, but it's also saying it's having too much. The brain is saying it likes the taste of soda, but taste isn't nutrition.

Most people have not trained themselves to pull off intuitive eating and thus their bodies just crave fats and carbs, so the best thing to do to improve their diet is to satisfy those cravings while consuming fewer calories.

The best thing to do to improve their diet is to improve their diet. The point is to learn that those cravings aren't right, so you can learn to identify your body's real cravings are. If you keep drinking diet soda you may be less likely to make meaningful change, at best you're delaying it.