this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
203 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
203 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The two biggest sources of microplastics are car tires and clothing. If you care about reducing microplastics, you should try to not buy plastic clothing (polyester, nylon, etc.) and instead buy biodegrable fibers like cotton or wool. I don't know what to do about the tire thing except drive maybe drive less?

[–] pepperonisalami@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not a personal solution but trains don't have tires, and busses probably consume less tires per person per km.

[–] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

trains don’t have tires

Oh?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And the noise, oh my fucking god, the noise!! My phone can measure accurately to 90dB and this thing hits 90 regularly.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If clothes are a very significant contributor, I'd like to see mandatory lint filters in new washing machines.

[–] TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The snag is that the 'micro' in 'microplastics' means they're too small to reasonably or reliably capture without great expense - even at the industrial scales of sewage treatment plants.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

See I thought about this and this is what I figured at first, but then it occurred to me that lint isn't actually microscopic. Some of it probably is, but I bet that the normal, trappable size lint escapes into the lakes via the sewage system and then degrades into microscopic plastics. Could be wrong but if this is true then filtering at the washer, using a mesh similar to the one for the dryer could be a significant help. If the numbers work of course.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Though where do you put the lint once filtered out? (Assuming most is filterable)

[–] Ironfist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

In your drinking water to make the process more efficient of course.

[–] grff@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think there is already a product that that will filter plastics out of the water out line on washing machine actually

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quite possibly. I think I recall something like that, but to be effective this has to be mandated to be included inside the washers themselves, similar to the lint filters in dryers.

[–] grff@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Would be nice to see that as a standard. But I'm sure they will fight tooth and nail to save the 10 dollars per unit it would cost