834
submitted 10 months ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] VulKendov@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

Lower pH means stronger acid. Soda is not more acidic than you stomach acid. The real danger that the acidity of soda poses is to your teeth.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

And considering the knock-on effects to the rest of your body from your teeth, it's not an issue to sneeze at.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

31436 readers
952 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS