834
submitted 10 months ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cooljacob204@kbin.social 37 points 10 months ago

Regardless of this corrupt shit, in general studies show that it's safe in normal quantities. Health wise it's much better then sugar.

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

What's a normal quantity? Keep in mind that caffeine is addictive, driving consumption. Not a good combination to use chemicals that are safe in small quantities, in a product designed to be addictive.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

31411 readers
1191 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS