38
submitted 2 weeks ago by Mex@feddit.uk to c/active_travel@feddit.uk
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly seems more like an art project than a legitimately useful-for-any-purpose bridge - like it's beautiful and makes the neighborhood nicer, but also... It cuts maybe 30 seconds off of the walking route?

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago

When you dig into the plans, it's pretty much that: A nice way for people to walk through the wetlands.
It's not designed to cut time off any journey.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's why I posted the picture, there's really no reason for cyclists to go on the bridge, it might save them 30 seconds. The article is click bait

[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

If anything it probably makes the biking route take a bit longer, since you still have lots of walkers to dodge but a lot less room to do so, and on a curvier path with some unknown-to-me material that's probably not as smooth as pavement.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
38 points (93.2% liked)

UK Active Travel

56 readers
2 users here now

Any discussion of active travel.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS