this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
214 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

72375 readers
3001 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
214
Is it time to question the yearly release cycle for phones? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So recently I've been seeing the trend where Android OEMs such as Google, Samsung, etc. have been extending their software release times up to like five, six, and seven years after device release. Clearly, phone hardware has gotten to the point where it can support software for that long, and computers have been in that stage for a very long time. From what I can tell, the only OEM that does this currently might be Fairphone.

Edit: The battery is the thing that goes the fastest so manufacturers could just offer new batteries and that would solve a lot of the problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 75 points 8 months ago (9 children)

They could have always supported software for that long. They simply refused to.

There is no benefit to slowing the release cycle. All of the research gets done either way, all of the supply chain modifications get made either way, and as an individual you have no need to replace your phone every year. A multi-year release cycle does very little but screw over people who need a new phone during the wrong point in the release cycle, while also substantially complicating the supply chains by making demand much spikier.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Compare with the yearly release cycle on cars.

[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 9 points 8 months ago

People apparently use installment plans for phone purchases these days, along with a downstream used market, so it's actually a really apt analogy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)