18
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
18 points (90.9% liked)
Formula 1
9043 readers
157 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | 01-03 Nov |
| 🇺🇸 United States | 21-23 Nov |
| 🇶🇦 Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| 🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ridiculous argumentation. They should have considered the opposite: "competitor has not learned from previous case and will get double the penalty"
But it would be even better if they would stick their heads in the Arabian desert sand and shut the fuck up with this completer and utter bs.
There is a linguistic mistake here, or is it actually what they did?
Did they mean:
It's a weird englishism and in this context they're using "consider" to mean the same as "believe", probably because saying "believe" implies it's a more personal opinion than "consider".
On the second page they mention that him being immediately apologetic was mitigating for his penalty. Still a shitshow, though.