this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
539 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

76395 readers
2702 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

monkey who more or less did that already. His name is William.

????????

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Ol Bill Shakespeare. He wrote Hamlet, one correct letter at a time.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Humans are apes, apes are monkeys, paraphyletic groups are bullshit.

[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

isnt that a misconception? apes just share a common ancestor with us

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be entirely fair, apes aren't monkeys. I don't think that particular distinction is really all that relevant to the discussion, but technically...

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

From wikipedia:

Traditionally, all animals in the group now known as simians are counted as monkeys except the apes. Thus monkeys, in that sense, constitute an incomplete paraphyletic grouping; however, in the broader sense based on cladistics, apes (Hominoidea) are also included, making the terms monkeys and simians synonyms in regard to their scope.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh neat. This is all taxonomy that is well beyond me. My defense of calling humans monkeys is that everyone does it, and that's how language works. Glad to know I'm correct too, technically lol

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Username checks out.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well. technically he was an ape rather than a monkey.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Technically true, I think it still fits for the layman.