this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
308 points (99.4% liked)

Open Source

41127 readers
578 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Unfortubately I am locked in to protonmail :/ otherwise I'd love to use it, looks great

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There is apparently a way to set up a bridge that will allow you to access it, but that sounds like an awful lot of work. It also requires connecting to a PC running the software, and I would imagine it affects the security of the messaging (which may be the reason to choose proton mail in the first place).

https://proton.me/support/protonmail-bridge-clients-windows-thunderbird

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm in the same boat - with them for the encrypted email, but it does hold me back from using third party apps on mobile. Hopefully they get an easier way to use third party apps on mobile. Will probably just end up being a mobile bridge app or something

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They have an app though, do you not like it?

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's pretty but feature-deficient and not very pleasant to use compared to third party email apps imo

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

This remains my #1 complaint every time they send me a "how are we doing" survey

I check, then reply:

Your email app still doesn't support basic functionality like creating and editing filters, something I had to code for a phone app back in high school

Like, holy shit, the feature exists on desktop why the fuck can't I have it in the app rreeeeeeeeeeeeeee

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Thx! That's for desktop. The bridge is alright. There's no major drawback to it afaik. But this is news about android. Thunderbird bought k9mail

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The bridge just creates imap/smtp servers, so you should be able to add it to thunderbird on Android.

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That's very good to know, thx! But that means I have to run the bridge on my server, open the ports there etc. , right?

[–] mac@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Edit: just tried this and it didn't work. Proton bridge only listens on 127.0.0.1 and doesn't accept incoming connections due to security concerns.

If I were in your position, which I am and will probably end up doing this, is vpn into your home network and just connect to the local IP of your bridge server.

WG tunnel on F droid allows for you to auto connect to your wireguard server when you leave your home net, and auto disconnects when you get back on your home net.

Personally, I'm unsure if proton bridge listens for external request or if it only accepts requests from localhost? If that's the case it may be an issue.

[–] Imnebuddy@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

https://github.com/exander77/proton-bridge-android

There is a way to do it locally on an Android device using Termux.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why locked? Proton mail does'nt have a protocol?

[–] exu@feditown.com 9 points 11 months ago

No IMAP/SMTP support with ProtonMail. You have to run their bridge application locally to get that functionality.
IMAP/SMTP does make their encryption at rest impossible, AFAIK similar providers like tuta don't have those either.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Calendar is even worse. There's no bridge at all. Proton should've used a standard protocol and put their encryption on top of it in a separate layer to make it comlatible with other software

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Proton should've used a standard protocol and put their encryption on top of it in a separate layer to make it comlatible with other software

That's a hacky approach ngl. Security would've left the chat the exact moment they had a thought about doing that in their heads. Proton is a known company. Imo developing their own protocol is a good decision if they can't make the existing one work properly at all.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Proton sucks.

I had an account, way too many problems. Apps sucked ass.