this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
286 points (98.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3468 readers
1622 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sgnl@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No they legally can't. It's defamation until a verdict is in. First Amendment isn't freedom from consequences of your speech.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It isn't defamation unless it is actually false, and the risks are a civil lawsuit.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

You all are talking past each other because you're talking about different things. They can't say he's guilty until he's convicted, because he isn't guilty until then. They also don't have to say he 'allegedly' punched someone when multiple people reported witnessing it, the other guy's face is bloody and and there is video of him hitting the guy. Saying he's guilty of a crime and saying he punched someone are two different claims.