this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
572 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

32179 readers
420 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most servers are not able to access the Google API.

Invidious report of the same(ish) problem: https://github.com/iv-org/invidious/issues/4045#issuecomment-1674373088

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmy@lemmy.stonansh.org 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not for free. They use your data. Also most of these 'free' videos are made by enthusiasts.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most of what they use your data for is to serve you ads. If you're blocking ads, that data isn't all that valuable.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They still have valuable data, they collect how interesting something is, so you're even contributing to the algorithm and you essentially advertise videos you're watching to other users with similar interests on the platform. People without adblock will come plenty.

That ad blocking on Youtube makes you a worthless user for anyone on there is just not true.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Enthusiasts who want to earn money off the platform, yes.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, because humans never want to share information, or show others something they've achieved or created. The only possible motivation could be money.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not what I'm saying, but these people choose to upload their content to YouTube specifically, so what's your point?

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's there's not really another platform to upload to that you can easily share long form video content on, for free? I don't understand your point now.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point is that nothing is free. You can't have it both ways.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

What? My initial point was people wanted to share things like information or creativity and youtube is one of the only viable places to upload too. I literally don't understand your points.

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but they can't anyways because google never fixed their completely borked content ID system. Half the people I watch just assume that all of their videos will be demonitized anyways. They make all of their money off of patreon.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I'm no Google fan, but it's borderline impossible to moderate a site of that size. It's a legal nightmare that cannot be solved by just humans. Read some articles about the human moderators of sites like YouTube and Facebook. Those people see some shit.

But yes, YouTube should definitely improve their escalation system, and pay more attention to refuted strikes. It sucks to see innocent creators get punished by a broken system.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

As a contributor who doesn't monetize videos, you don't speak for everyone.