891

Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 5 days ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

306 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 43 points 4 days ago

This has literally always been the case with Steam, the only difference is that people are told up front now. Things will likely continue to operate exactly the same as it has until now, I doubt Valve wants to disrupt the giant money train they have.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

I would be surprised if it even was possible for them to change so that the games are bought. I suspect that would be quite complicated legally.

[-] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago

It's literally in the title that GOG does exactly that. Why would Steam's hands be legally tied if GOG's aren't?

[-] lud@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

No, that isn't what GOG is doing.

GOG is still only licencing games to you. They do offer you the opportunity to download an offline installer though.

[-] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

How is having an offline installer that can't be taken away, not the same thing as owning?

[-] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Because you are still only licensed the game

[-] kshade@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

As far as I know there is no mandatory DRM on Steam either, so if a publisher wants to they can just make their game be portable and not require Steam to even be installed. Pretty sure all the re-releases that use DOSBox or ScummVM are like this, for example.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah there are loads of DRM free games on steam (mostly indies of course). Steam just offers a very basic (and easily bypassable if you know how) DRM to devs/publishers but they absolutely don't need to use it.