241
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] automater@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago

Are there any moderators on here? Mint press news.... Jesus

[-] CamaradeBoina@hexbear.net 60 points 1 year ago

Well I mean barring your personal dislike of the source, it does report an objective fact: opium cash crop farming exploded under the US / Joint alliance occupation and decade+long anti insurgency war, and died out once they left.

And this objective fact DOES raise important questions: what in the hell was the US doing all this time? They had infinitely more resources than the Talibans do now to subsidize non opium crops for farmers, to encourage diversification and development, etc. Did they turn a blind eye to the mass scale poppy farming? If so, why? It generated huge sums, was it a strategic use of and encouragement of corruption of local Afghan administrators and tribal elite to "make the occupation easier"? Did some money return to western elements? What was the impact on world trafficking?

Like you can dislike mintpress news but IMO it's important to, now that the US/West occupation of Afghanistan is over, not swipe it all under the rug and investigate.

[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Fighting the Taliban? The objectives had nothing to do with the war on drugs. I thought it was well known that the reason there was hardly any opium farming in Afganistan before the invasion was because of the Taliban.

We can go on about how the invasion failed catastrophically but. This is just Afganistan going back to the way it was.

[-] GreenTeaRedFlag@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

when the news article is correct but not liberal enough fro you.

[-] RuthlessCriticism@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

When you are so deeply propagandized that seeing any different viewpoint causes you to cry for help.

[-] oregoncom@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

If you're so much of an intellectual coward that the only thing you can do is cry propaganda when presented with a dissenting opinion, then you should go back to reddit.

[-] maporita@unilem.org -4 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure if you noticed but when you're scrolling down your feed list, just below the link itself is a little bit of text that shows the source. Just read it .. takes a fraction of a second.. and if it's from somewhere you don't like then don't open it. Just move on.

Moderators .. please pay no attention to posters like this, you're doing a fine job and we thank you. Keep the news coming from various sources abd let us decide for ourselves if we want to read it. Like adults.

[-] automater@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

The rules specifically say reputable news sources only. I didn't make the rules. If you don't like them maybe you should go.

[-] maporita@unilem.org -3 points 1 year ago

And who defines reputable? You I suppose?

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
241 points (74.0% liked)

World News

32037 readers
668 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS