this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
250 points (98.4% liked)

Futurology

3283 readers
210 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 11 months ago (18 children)

I don't see how vertical farming can make sense. There is only so much sunlight striking the ground and you just changed the angle and so shaded something else.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (12 children)
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Sure, but where does the energy for that light come from? If the answer is burning things (this is the most likely answer today!) then you are making the world worse. Renewable answers all go back to the sun so why not use the sun directly and avoid all the inefficiencies from turning the sun into electric and then back into light? Which leaves nuclear - which is dieing because of expense.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it can come from renewables. There are many ways to build renewables in a way that doesn’t use additional surface area. Like you can have wild nature with wind turbines sprinkled throughout. Solar panels can built on top of most structures humans build anyway.

Vertical farming has the potential to use less land, allowing more wild natural ecosystems.

The controlled environment of vertical farming also allows you to work in a cleaner environment, meaning less need to employ pesticides.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

We can also do agrifarming and use the space under the panels for animals to graze or whatever else they've come up with.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)