424
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 92 points 1 month ago

Eliminate the fillabuster and expand the Supreme Court plz. It should be one judge per circuit, and that's 13 now.

Also, the expansion of the House wouldn't be a bad thing. It was supposed to keep up with the population but was capped in the 20s.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 month ago
[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago

Not sure about two but Washington D.C. should have statehood.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago
[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

We can recombine the Dakotas while we're at it, what a waste of money and time to have two.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Puerto Rico swings back and forth on wanting statehood. Guam?

The danger is once the filibuster is dropped, the GOP might go ahead and drop it again to undo the changes the next time they take power.

I'd say drop the filibuster first and go with the 127 DC states plan - https://www.vox.com/2020/1/14/21063591/modest-proposal-to-save-american-democracy-pack-the-union-harvard-law-review

That would give Dems the required supermajority not only in Senate and House, but also among States. So we can pass constitutional amendments to secure abortion, fix the Supreme Court, fix or abolish the Electoral College, and other things.

Afterwards, pass an amendment turning the 127 DC states into a single state, leaving aside the Capitol Area (the White House, Congress, etc would technically not be part of the new state but remain federal territory). In the same amendment, lock down the filibuster so if the GOP ever retakes power after this, they won't be able to use the same trick to undo these changes.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Both north DC and south DC ;)

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

I would split east and west Texas first. Use the Trinity river as a natural divider.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
424 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS