1

idk where to really put this (might turn into a blog post later or something). it's what you might call a "hot take", certainly a heterodox one to some parts of the broader #fediverse community. this is in response to recent discussion on "what do you want to see from AP/AS2 specs" (in context of wg rechartering) mostly devolving into people complaining about JSON-LD and extensibility, some even about namespacing in general (there was a suggestion to use UUID vocab terms. i'm not joking)

1/?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] trwnh@mastodon.social 1 points 1 week ago

this is the fundamental divide between #fediverse thinking and #Web thinking, where #ActivityPub straddles the line between both.

i've seen it said that the "open-world assumption" at the foundation of the Web is actually an undesirable thing for a "social networking protocol", and as a consequence, specs built on that open-world assumption are "completely unsuitable" for that "protocol".

but do we need a "social networking protocol"? do we even need "social networks" in the first place?

9/?

[-] MichaelTBacon@social.coop 1 points 1 week ago

@trwnh@mastodon.social

<gestures to the sign>

https://social.coop/@MichaelTBacon/110634358031380559

Non-corporate/non-VC social media really needs to stop hating on "walled gardens" and start thinking about how you mind the gate that lets you into the garden and who gets in and who gets out.

If this exclusion still seems bad, start with "fascists" and then work outward from there.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (62 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

News from fediverse

0 readers
26 users here now

founded 9 months ago