62
submitted 6 days ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

By Brett Wilkins

September 12, 2024

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

One of the things LNG has over coal is that it's very easy to turn off and on in case cheaper sources aren't producing enough. LNG plays much better with renewables and coal also produces ton of pollution and particulate matter. It's the lesser of two evils when there are no methane leaks.

Methane leaks will still punch the climate in the gut so any leaks are unacceptable and all methane gas needs to be accounted for.

Both obviously need to be replaced with renewables and large cost efficient energy storage. Hydrogen is attractive since energy doesn't degrade over time, pumped hydro for weekly to monthly high quantity and power, flywheels/lithium batteries to stabilise the grid frequency, heat storage with district heating for households and redux flow batteries with massive containers for winter/summer differences.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
62 points (90.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7120 readers
507 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS