Linux

48247 readers

459 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

395

What's your favorite Linux Desktop software? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

204 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For me, it's hands down Flameshot. The best screenshot tool in the world - I've got it hooked up to my PrtScrn key for super easy screenshots.

I also love Kwrite as a Notepad++ alternative, and KolourPaint as a MSPaint alternative

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Qvest@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Excuse my silly question, but what does mpv do that vlc doesn't?

[–] Maxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

MPV has automatic native wayland support, VLC doesn’t (yet, see https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VLC_media_player#Wayland_support)

I haven’t found any other large differences in functionality when it comes to simply playing video (only thing I use either one for).

[–] ayaya 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

VLC is also less accurate to the source than mpv is.

See the notice on this wiki that contains some comparisons.

I don't know the full details but this is a quote I have seen from reddit about VLC:

uses wrong matrix for RGB conversion (results in wrong colors)

uses point upscaling for chroma planes

introduces strong banding

wrong chroma location (MPEG-1 for everything)

Old subtitle renderer that in more Typesetting heavy situation will say fuck you

all the other bugs (including some that haven't been fixed in years) make it equally unsuitable media player.

It is probably possible to get things in order by digging into the settings in VLC, but mpv prioritizes accuracy by default.

[–] Madiator2011@lm.madiator.cloud 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For me I got mad at VLC cause it was opening video track in separate window for some reason.

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

MPV handles decoding much better than VLC, in my experience trying to watch fansubs

[–] jsnc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Both are comparable in terms of video playback (both use hardware acceleration and ffmpeg) but mpv's appeal is that it's ultimately a minimal (as in lack of apparent GUI) command line tool rather than a fully featured application like VLC. I like mpv because of it's non-features which is why it's the backend for a lot of Desktop environment video players.

[–] Drito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you want minimalism I advise you to use a tiling window manager instead of Gnome. If you want Wayland absolutely, use Hyprland.

[–] jsnc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

I use POP!_OS right now so I'm waiting for System76 to release their cosmic-epoch to have the definitive non-GNOME/KDE wayland desktop environment.