464
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago

The republicans would have to find someone new, really quickly.

Trump will never drop out though.

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

But the cheeseburgers could catch up to him at any moment. He's old AF and looks to be in terrible shape.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

That would be sooo awesome.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Believe it or not, he's lost a lot of weight in the past year. He must be laying off the Big Macs (and/or downing amphetamines)

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Even if true, I refuse to believe it was intentional.

He doesn't look like he has lost any weight.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

He does to me. I first noticed it last month, then I googled it and people had first started talking about it last spring. There is a lot of speculation he's on Ozempic, but it's also possible he just learned how to shut his pie hole.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Could be stress from the felony cases. Hopefully he dies of it.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

GLP1's working on a lot of people.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Can they though? RFK has been forced to stay on ballots in a few states because it's too late to drop out. States like MI is one and it would be a automatic win for Harris since ballots can't change.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

it would be a automatic win for Harris since ballots can’t change.

That sounds premature.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

I believe from memory (and I'd have to research this myself again) that while the ballots wouldn't change, whoever the GOP has running in his place would win the spot. You can't just win an election because your opponent disappears.

[-] odelik@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

Each state would have to decide for themselves how it works.

And yes, candidates win all the time due to their opposition dropping out, dying, etc etc. But TMK, has never happened with a presidential election.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

I would LOVE to see Trump drop out for whatever reason, and then the GOP has a vote like they did for the speaker of the house to see who takes his place. The drama of all the wackos that 1/2 of even the GOP worst dislike, mixed with all the opportunist bottom feeders, all trying to battle it out to lead the party in the new power vacuum of "yes men/women" would be just pay-per-view level entertainment.

[-] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Or if he doesn't drop out, it will still be worth watching Trump getting weaker and weaker while the vultures are circling.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I think this is what they're hoping for: Trump holds on until the election, then kicks the bucket a month into office so Vance, a far more naked and coherent authoritarian, can take his place and start signing whatever he wants, with little to no fanfare or recognition because he's happy to just have power.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh look what you did: you made Kevin McCarthy cry. I hope you're proud of yourself.

Well done!

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
464 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18930 readers
3003 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS