166
submitted 1 year ago by MrPhibb@reddthat.com to c/usa@lemmy.ml

I don't think law enforcement is going to like the outcome of this...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

A confidential source contacted the newspaper, Meyer said, and provided evidence that Newell had been convicted of drunken driving and continued to use her vehicle without a driver’s license. The criminal record could jeopardize her efforts to obtain a liquor license for her catering business.

A reporter with the Marion Record used a state website to verify the information provided by the source. But Meyer suspected the source was relaying information from Newell’s husband, who had filed for divorce. Meyer decided not to publish a story about the information, and he alerted police to the situation.

Ignoring all the obvious issues with the legality of a search in general, this was all triggered by the newspaper using discretion and not publishing the story?

How the fuck do you think that's going to serve your needs?

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
166 points (99.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7178 readers
388 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS