this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
170 points (82.2% liked)

Firefox

20812 readers
1 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because it doesn't make sense for all Firefox marketing material to be how shit chrome is. Save that bullshit for American president elections

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It will be exciting to see Kamala and Trump debate whether Gecko or Blink should be the industry leader.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Kinda off topic, but I find it weird that Kamala is usually referred by first name, and trump by surname.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

It's a "brand recognition" kind of thing.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

I think it's because that's the more distinctive part of her name. "President Harris" sounds kind of generic, like the fictional president from an action movie.

It may start to constitute a pattern that the same was true of Hillary Clinton, though in that case it was likely that just saying "Clinton" might cause confusion with Bill.

Also Bernie Sanders is mostly referred to by his first name, so…

[–] scorp@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Trump™ Kamala™

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

They should get married. Then it would be Kamala Trump

[–] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago

Harris can't deny the popularity of Blink. Trump is a die-hard EdgeHTML advocate.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Would it... though?

[–] Trilobite@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not saying anything bad about chrome is probably in the contract they have with Google which is most of their income

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah I doubt, it would be a huge lawsuit if google was found to pay competitors for staying quiet about their flaws

[–] Trilobite@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Sure they could sue but that's a lose lose situation even if they won Google would not give them money anymore and they need that to stay in Business

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Hold up

American presidents are hating on Chrome? What did I miss?