794
submitted 1 month ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/19046336

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 54 points 1 month ago

By the nine divines... Why does it take libs 80 years extra to reach the conclusions that Marxists have already described in detail in the last century...

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most people who were paying attention to the world when 1929 happened and witnessed the consequences up to 1945 are dying now. The people who were paying attention to the world when 2008 happened haven't seen how the story ends.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

Oddly, 1929-1945 and 2008-2024 are the same distance apart. Were you trying to do that or is it just eerie coincidence?

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 11 points 1 month ago

eheh, I'm a pessimist, what can I say 😅

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Mainly because we spent 80 years being told to snitch on our neighbors and that commies are the devil himself come to wipe the world clean of good moral people.

It's still going to be a long time till Marx is given an objective position in western society, if ever.

[-] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

because they live in a delusional fantasy world where belief in things corellates with warm fuzzy feelings more than congruence with material reality, "truth" is socially reinforced, and... shit, shit this reminds me of something.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He is not taking a Marxist position. Possibly agreeing with parts of the same analysis as Marx but definitely not the same prescription. Not every criticism of Capitalism is an endorsement of Marxism

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

He is not taking a Marxist position

Precisely that's why it's taken him 80 years longer than Marxists to reach that conclusion.

Not every criticism of Capitalism is an endorsement of Marxism

Which is why non-marxist anti-capitalist movements such as Salvador Allende's socialism in Chile, or Mosaddegh's Iran, inevitably fail within a few years due to the lack of understanding of class struggle and the history of capitalism.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I take it you have a Marxist state as a counter example showing it's superiority and longevity?

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

USSR lasted much longer than Allende's project, and Cuba is still ongoing

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The question was superiority and longevity. Are you claiming those are both superior states as well?

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago

The USSR and Cuba are much more desirable than the short-lived wannabe socialist regime that led to Pinochet's dictatorship, yes, how do you not see this?

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
794 points (96.7% liked)

World News

38647 readers
2335 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS