34
submitted 1 month ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

“The underlying problem here is that the RCMP is presuming that a person who is engaged in environmental activism, necessarily, is a higher risk for engaging in criminal behaviour — that somehow, that you're voicing dissent, that you pose a risk of criminality,” Jack said, “and that that gives the police the authority to be investigating you, following you, collecting information about you.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sparky57@mastodon.social 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

@NightOwl the previous d. Superintendant for New Brunswick have brought this up. the RCMP should never be a personal goon squad for a government, church, or industry. … yet they whine go full defcon crybaby when they get defunded.

And dont fall for the apologies. the minister for public safety is not sorry for the harm they inflicted. they are sorry they got caught.

the woke Elders of THE CABAL OF ARGUS
We will see

:wq

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7136 readers
230 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS