this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
513 points (96.1% liked)

Selfhosted

56473 readers
718 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here we are - 3600 which was still under manufacture 2-3 years ago are not get patched. Shame on you AMD, if it is true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 62 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Tangent: If we started buying risc-v systems we might get to a point where they can actually compete.

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's still far away from us as a consumer standpoint, but I'm eagerly waiting for a time when I could buy a RISC V laptop with atleast midrange computing capabalities

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I‘m more on the builder/tinkerer side so I‘m pretty much in starting position with risc-v now. But yes, its going to be some time before any of it is user ready as a pc.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Framework has a laptop in progress if you're interested

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Indeed I am. I‘m in posession of a working laptop but I could maybe order a riscv tablet from pine64. I already have the pinetime and the stuff is pretty awesome.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well the Star64 from Pine is pretty good, just doesn't have enough processing power and IO for my liking.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] amanda@aggregatet.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As in efficient per watt or some other metric?

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not buying hardware that doesn't suit my needs as an investment hoping maybe it eventually will.

[–] amanda@aggregatet.org 3 points 2 years ago

This is one of the hardest earned lessons I’ve ever learned, and I’ve had to learn it over and over again. I think it’s mostly stuck now but I still make the same mistake from time to time.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, thats the reason why we‘re in this capitalist hellhole. Perfection comes from billionaire money, nothing else.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What are you talking about perfection?

Buying something that doesn't function is never rational.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not buying hardware that doesn't suit my needs as an investment hoping maybe it eventually will.

You were misrepresenting things. Your needs have nothing to do with things not being functional. Something can be perfectly functional and not meet someones needs. Nobody said you should buy it as an investment.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My interpretation was by far the most generous to your position, because it's the only way it's coherent.

If people bought [this hardware that doesn't actually provide anything anyone can realistically use at a reasonable price] it might eventually not suck. That's treating a current purchase as an imaginary investment in maybe eventually being able to buy something useful.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My interpretation was by far the most generous to your position, because it's the only way it's coherent.

You’re entitled to your opinion, I guess.

hardware that doesn't actually provide anything anyone can realistically use

Thats misrepresenting reality and making assumptions while clearly showing lack of expertise

at a reasonable price

Thats completely arbitrary. If a price is reasonable or not depends on many factors. Obvious oversymplification.

That's treating a current purchase as an imaginary investment in maybe eventually being able to buy something useful.

This shows that you have no idea what you are talking about. Small companies and open source projects depend on people buying their products instead of cheaper, sometimes better performing products of big conglomerates for other reasons than price alone.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Value is absolutely not arbitrary.

"Reasonable" means comparable with x86/ARM at the same performance level. Anything more is, by definition, not capable of being reasonably priced.

You're again advocating for an imaginary investment in a bad product.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah no. Forget it. We‘re not speaking the same language.

[–] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jeff Geerling had a video recently about the state of RISC V for desktop. https://youtu.be/YxtFctEsHy0?si=SUQBiepSeOne8-2u

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 7 points 2 years ago

I really enjoyed watching it. Thanks for referring to it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At the rate we are going Qualcomm might pivot to Risc-V (they are being sued by ARM)

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 2 years ago

Interesting! Thanks for chiming in. I‘ll read up about it.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm waiting to see how DeepComputing's RISC-V mainboard for the Framework turns out. I'm aware that this is very much a development platform and far from an actual end-user product, but if the price is right, I might jump in to experiment.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a cool idea! :)