this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
513 points (96.1% liked)

Selfhosted

60451 readers
947 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
513
AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 2 years ago by TheHolm@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
180 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Here we are - 3600 which was still under manufacture 2-3 years ago are not get patched. Shame on you AMD, if it is true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not buying hardware that doesn't suit my needs as an investment hoping maybe it eventually will.

You were misrepresenting things. Your needs have nothing to do with things not being functional. Something can be perfectly functional and not meet someones needs. Nobody said you should buy it as an investment.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My interpretation was by far the most generous to your position, because it's the only way it's coherent.

If people bought [this hardware that doesn't actually provide anything anyone can realistically use at a reasonable price] it might eventually not suck. That's treating a current purchase as an imaginary investment in maybe eventually being able to buy something useful.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My interpretation was by far the most generous to your position, because it's the only way it's coherent.

You’re entitled to your opinion, I guess.

hardware that doesn't actually provide anything anyone can realistically use

Thats misrepresenting reality and making assumptions while clearly showing lack of expertise

at a reasonable price

Thats completely arbitrary. If a price is reasonable or not depends on many factors. Obvious oversymplification.

That's treating a current purchase as an imaginary investment in maybe eventually being able to buy something useful.

This shows that you have no idea what you are talking about. Small companies and open source projects depend on people buying their products instead of cheaper, sometimes better performing products of big conglomerates for other reasons than price alone.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Value is absolutely not arbitrary.

"Reasonable" means comparable with x86/ARM at the same performance level. Anything more is, by definition, not capable of being reasonably priced.

You're again advocating for an imaginary investment in a bad product.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah no. Forget it. We‘re not speaking the same language.