120
The state of US political discourse
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
120 points (70.8% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7328 readers
114 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
As an organizer in my free time it's hardly unrealistic to suggest other people do the same. These are also well-demonstrated strategies, whereas individualistic lesser evil voting is not. You just disempower yourself.
And as you can see, this false logic also leads liberals to begin defending the lesser evils. Right now, they are defending genocide. My hope is that a few of them may break free of their propaganda and become true allies of people around the world and their own neighborhoods.
God forbid political power take work and time. Better to be ineffectual and rhetorically entrench the sociopathic status quo, eh?
No. It requires shedding the political myopia that ensures your complacency. But you should begin building it now, and it is okay for its birth to be fitful. Begin having conversations now to see who would be interested. Join a left org that may be interested in this. Stop defending genocide.
Yes. This is how it has been for hundreds of years. People with less time and means did far more than this. You just have to actually believe that politics is important.
How much time do you spend on social media, for example? Why not spend that time organizing meetings?
Our enemies include that but are even larger and more powerful.
Far more has been done before. You gave been taught complacency. And to defend the status quo.
You aren't saving anything. Your strategy makes you a complacent individual that simply allows the same system chugging along into depravity, like open support for genocide. You aren't even organized. How on earty could you ever take credit for anything? Pure fairy tales.
Do you even live in a swing state?
Im sure as someone who does it everyday you do think that
This is the largest point I'm trying to make the time and effort it will take cannot be completed before the election. I mean you even agreed:
Your response was No.
Do you think every American agrees and will just jump on board?
No defending it I hate it but stop acting like it can change before the election, it is not enough time which is my point, not a defense.
Couple hours after work, 10 mins before work, and while shitting. Drive times alone wouldn't be meet with this time.
Don't know what I took credit for but sure
Do you even live in America?
I don't do it every day. But I do it often enough to be reliable and have good capacity.
But it's not just me nor has it ever been. People from all nations have done this. People in far worse conditions. It is necessary and, historically, feasible so long as you can break false consciousness.
To begin building the necessary project you have to reject the political election myopia that our masters impose on us. Politics does not restart every 2-4 years. Only long-term engagement and the development and wielding of leverage will ever liberate us.
No, but why do they need to? Our task requires work and time. You keep acting like this makes it impossible. I suggest that this is a learned helplessness, of internalizing the false idea that there is no alternative. In fact, there has always been an alternative and others have blazed trails.
It is already a defense in that it is a form of apologetics for the genocidal status quo. It defends and entrenches the idea that your job, politically, is to decide who to cheerlead with a vote. It normalizes accepting and tolerating the genocide of Gaza, as even that us not enough for you to take sufficient pause. You are lost in propaganda, but you can free yourself through education.
A common dedicated organizing commitment is 1-2 meetings per week (often online) and around one action per month. Though there are often opportunities to do what works around anyone's schedule.
There is a tendency in bourgeois electoralism to dramatically exaggerate the impact of a given activity. Usually, but not always, voting. The purpose is to make the target audience feel like what they were told to do matters, was worthwhile, and to keep them doing it. This is what I am referring to by credit - of an exaggerated assignment of value to the activity I was responding to.
Why would that matter? My question to you does matter: if you don't live in a swing state your presidential vote is as worthless as it gets.
What would your point be if I were or were not American? Please don't be xenophobic.