174
submitted 1 month ago by gytrash@feddit.uk to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

"Last month, Mozilla made a quiet change in Firefox that caused some diehard users to revolt..."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 39 points 1 month ago

Laura Chambers, who stepped into an interim CEO role at Mozilla in February, says the company is reinvesting in Firefox after letting it languish in recent years,

It's sort of amusing to me that Mozilla would let the Firefox browser languish. Is that not the raison d'etre of your entire organization? What are you doing with your time and effort if you are allowing your core product to languish? What would people say if Microsoft said "yeah, we've allowed windows to languish in recent years." What an insane notion.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What would people say if Microsoft said "yeah, we've allowed windows to languish in recent years."

Well, I think they did let it languish, if looking at it being enshittified in ~~recent~~ last ~10 years. Also, it's not their core product anymore. Almost nobody buys a windows license anymore, because piracy was already high, and they let you keep your license from the previous version so whether you had one or not, most probably now you have.
I think Microsoft's core product has not been windows for a long time, but their cloud services, and maybe office and the other common business tools.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

There was a graphic here a while ago. What was it, about 4/5 are Azure and Office 365, Windows less than 1/5.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Let me tell my management they no longer have to pay windows license for the ~10,000 user machines, and then the servers.

While a single consumer can get away with it (and MS doesn't care because it means they're using Windows and likely using MS services, all while getting telemetry from the desktops), it's far from "nobody buys a windows license any more".

Even SMB's will pay, because if they don't MS will hammer them financially. No SMB could stand up to what MS can do to them - $200 windows license is cheap insurance.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Let me tell my management they no longer have to pay windows license for the ~10,000 user machines, and then the servers.

Current sales are nothing compared to earlier windows versions.

[-] Akisamb@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago

They've got thunderbird which is as far as I know the only serious alternative to outlook.

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago

Kinda but Thunderbird is community driven, and spun out into an independent subsidiary.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

And I wouldn't call it serious, the performance is atrocious.

It's so bad I went and installed outlook from 2016

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

You're not arguing from a position of strength if your personal anecdote is performance issues, 8 years ago.

[-] Roopappy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I think you misread that. This poster's experience isn't from 2016. They installed a program called "Outlook 2016" recently.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

You may be right, but they literally wrote "from 2016". So yeah, I read that as "Since 2016 onwards..."

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
174 points (98.3% liked)

Privacy

31373 readers
466 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS