418
submitted 3 months ago by hydroptic@sopuli.xyz to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

This is a convoluted uncharitable interpretation. She specifically condemns support of pro-Hamas graffiti and rhetoric. It's disingenuous to read that as blanket condemnation of all pro-Palestinian protesters.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No where in her statement does she clarify that any of the people protesting Netanyahu were in the right. She didn't go that extra step to show any solidarity with any of the protesters, and maybe that's because she's a coward and didn't want to appear pro-Hamas. Yet, Trump wouldn't do that to his base. He'd condemn violence in general and then say there were very fine people on both sides, and by doing so he became even more popular. Harris missed an opportunity to make her position more clear.

In fact, she has been frustratingly vague about this entire situation! A ceasefire, but how long? Hostage release, but does that include the Palestinian hostages held by Israel? What about the ICC and ICJ decisions? What about UNRWA? Crickets...

She needs to make her position clear, and I think her VP pick will clarify it for a lot of people.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

She specified her criticism was against pro-Hamas, and you're saying because she didn't make an additional redundant statement to clarify what that means that she's implying something other than her literal words? And her call for ceasefire isn't specific enough, despite the fact that she doesn't have the authority to draft specific details anyway?

Your reading comprehension isn't justification for extrapolating these wild hypotheticals.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Her statement reads as a condemnation of all protesters as pro-Hamas. It paints with a broad brush.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

We already established that this is straight up false. Ask your handler for better material.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We didn't establish shit, her statement doesn't separate the protesters into two groups.

Whatever. She didn't pick Shapiro which says, to me, that she's not willing to totally piss off the uncommitted movement. That's definitely positive.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
418 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39019 readers
722 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS