this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
484 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
2527 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
484
KOSA is dead! (US) (www.fightforthefuture.org)
submitted 3 months ago by thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/20332183

Fight for the Future writes:

"The controversial and unconstitutional Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) is officially dead in the House of Representatives. Reporting indicates that there was significant opposition to the bill within the Republican caucus, and it faced vocal opposition from prominent progressives like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rep Maxwell Frost (D-FL)."

Evan Greer:

"KOSA was a poorly written bill that would have made kids less safe. I am so proud of the LGBTQ youth and frontlines advocates who have led the opposition to this dangerous and misguided legislation. It’s good that this unconstitutional censorship bill is dead for now, but I am not breathing a sigh of relief. It’s infuriating that Congress wasted so much time and energy on a deeply flawed and controversial bill while failing to advance real measures to address the harms of Big Tech like privacy, antitrust and algorithmic justice legislation. "

Thanks to everybody who took action ove the last year to stop this bill!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 68 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They probably opposed the idea of safe kids, given the rest of the platform. That, or there was lobbying money.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 14 points 3 months ago

Considering the tech industry would need to use more money to enforce the law, it would be cheaper to just buy out politicians.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Their official line is based in fears of surveillance and government overreach. My state senator Mike Lee was one of them, must have been a cold day in Hell or something.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Please don’t perpetuate “think of the children” nonsense.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m not, it’s the name. The joke was that they saw the concept of safe kids in the Kids Online Safety Act and never read further.