161
submitted 3 months ago by genfood@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org

Rental prices in Europe are increasingly high. According to a Eurostat study, the average price for an unfurnished one-bedroom flat in the cities of London, Geneva and Dublin exceeds €2000. Eastern European cities generally have the lowest rental costs, such as in Skopje (€250), Pristina (€310) or Ankara (€410).

Do you think that Europe has already reached a housing crisis? And if so, how do you think we can get out of this situation?

Source: Eurostat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Skasi@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Keep in mind that these numbers are for above-average flats, ie in good locations, of good size (40-60m² or 60-80m², depending on the city) and for well-earning positions. Probably not the top 1%, but still generally well paid jobs. As such the presentation is inaccurate. Those are not "average prices in the city", but "average prices for good flats in good districts, comparable with Brussels".

source: 2023 CURRENT MARKET RENTS (pdf)

OBTAINED THROUGH SURVEYS WITH ESTATE AGENCIES, COVERING A SPECIFIC HOUSING SEGMENT

The rent data presented in this booklet are part of a wider work programme, whose objective is to compare the relative cost of living of international civil servants in any place of employment with that of Brussels, the reference city.

Since the aim of the entire exercise is to compare "like with like", the neighbourhoods surveyed may not necessarily be in those areas where expatriates actually live but are comparable with those actually occupied by officials in Brussels.

These neighbourhoods are described as residential areas of good quality, favoured by expatriates and professional people such as international civil servants, university staff, doctors, managers, and similar professionals, who pay their rent by themselves (i.e. not paid by their employers).

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

2500 is a shit flat in Geneva. Complete shit. A nice one would be 3600, and really nice one 8000.

Sauce: am Swiss

[-] Skasi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Well I guess in some countries people have way too much money...

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

Switzerland is wealthy but not that wealthy. A typical monthly net salary for a normal person might be in the 5000-7000 area. So you can see that a rent of 3600 is not sustainable and one of 8000 is impossible.

Normal people just don't live in the city centre unless they inherited ownership, share flats, or something like that.

[-] Skasi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think a rent of 3600 with 5000-7000 income could be sustainable. Kinda depending on the price of living, but I think the best case of 3400 each month would be enough in most of Europe. Still paying over half your salary probably wouldn't make sense for most people unless you live there 24/7 and the place is in a really good location (eg short transits to work, family and other places people frequently visit) and you really like it and/or it's cheaper than comparable flats.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

Spending 72% (3600 at 5000) is literally impossible if tax is 20% and mandatory health insurance is 7%. (Net income in Switzerland is before taxes and other mandatory expenses.)

In any case I'd seriously advise against spending more than 30% on living spaces.

[-] Skasi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Alright it wasn't clear whether or not this was after tax. Makes sense!

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm glad I could shed some light on it. I get mildly annoyed every time a non-Swiss European - only having heard of typical Swiss incomes and nothing else - acts as if we were super rich.

I mean we're doing ok, but our prices more than match the incomes.

[-] Skasi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean we’re doing ok, but our prices more than match the incomes.

Yeah I guess that's normal, because having more money means you'll want a bigger income and for people to afford paying high personell costs they'll have to sell products and services at higher prices.

I get mildly annoyed every time a non-Swiss European - only having heard of typical Swiss incomes and nothing else - acts as if we were super rich.

You didn't look annoyed. Your comment seemed neutral in tone.

Anyhow, with that much money compared to the rest of the world you are kinda "rich"-ish (depending on who you ask). Sure, you probably don't own ten mansions and yachts, but you're able to afford things inside and outside your country which some other people might not be able to afford (unless the product is price adjusted like eg Steam games which from what I understand are more expensive in Switcherland).

When I say "I guess in some countries people have way too much money" I don't mean to insult the inhabitants directly, rather I'm pointing out - in a perhaps mildly provocative manner - the unequal distribution of wealth around the globe.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Your comment seemed neutral in tone.

I see what you did there.

[-] Jajcus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

And these are mostly capitals – prices there are usually far above prices in our cities and towns in the same countries. And differences between capital cities and other places may differ in different countries. So it is not very representative for Europe as whole.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
161 points (92.6% liked)

Europe

1471 readers
454 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS