166

Generative AI is a climate disaster (techwontsave.us)

submitted 3 months ago by UnseriousAcademic@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The cost of simply retrieving an answer from the Web is infinitely smaller than the cost of generating a new one.

Great interview with Sasha Luccioni from Huggingface on all the ways that using generative AI for everything is both a) hugely costly compared to existing methods, and b) insane.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run -14 points 3 months ago

Nope it isn't. You blame AI companies for pollution they didn't generate. Blame the energy sector.

Why the hell aren't we using mix of nuclear and renewables in this day and age is beyond me

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 41 points 3 months ago

holy shit your post history of full of takes this bad, that's an impressive track record of dim. must be exhausting

load more comments (23 replies)

load more comments (24 replies)

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024

166 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1391 readers

58 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems