Latin American Publications!

140 readers
10 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

With 93.34% of the ballots processed by the ONPE, blank and null votes in the Peruvian presidential elections exceed each of the candidates.

Blank and null votes in Peru’s presidential elections have surpassed 3 million, a figure higher than the votes received by right-wing candidate Keiko Fujimori, who leads the official count by the National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) with 93.34% of the votes tallied.

Between these two categories, 3,142,121 votes have been registered, equivalent to 16.63% of the total cast, while Fujimori has obtained 2,685,995 votes (14.22% of the total), representing 17.05% of valid votes.

The breakdown indicates that blank votes reach 2,197,516 (11.63%) and null votes total 944,605 ​​(5%). This situation was influenced by the field of 35 presidential candidates, which fragmented the electorate to the point that the sum of blank and null votes exceeded the individual votes for each candidate.

Blank votes alone surpassed 34 of the 35 candidates, and null votes exceeded 29 candidates. Peruvian electoral law establishes that elections can only be annulled if null votes reach two-thirds of the total votes cast, a threshold not reached in this process.

Text reads:

“The Electoral Observation Mission of the OAS recognized the effort made by the electoral bodies to remedy the operational deficiencies presented on election day”.

Analyst Laura Arroyo: ‘There Is No Longer Democracy in Peru, Only Power Structures Ruling the Elections’

Turbulent ElectionsMore than 27.3 million Peruvians were called to elect authorities for the 2026-2031 term, in a context of political instability marked by eight presidents in the last decade.

The election day saw delays in the opening of polling stations in Lima due to logistical problems in the distribution of electoral materials, forcing thirteen schools to open on Monday. These incidents prompted accusations of fraud by the far-right candidate Rafael López Aliaga (Popular Renewal), though no evidence was presented. Electoral observation missions determined that the setbacks did not affect the outcome, deeming the process credible and transparent.

So far, only Fujimori has secured his place in the second round, scheduled for June 7. The final race will be between the leftist Roberto Sánchez (Together for Peru) and the ultraconservative López Aliaga, according to official vote count data.

(Telesur) by HGV


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

2
 
 

By Iason Athanasiadis  –  Apr 15, 2026

From Predator spyware to arms deals and military corridors, Athens has tied its future to Tel Aviv at the very moment the US-Israeli order is losing ground across West Asia.

The private jet taking off from Athens airport between 2020 and 2023 belonged to Israeli spyware company Intellexa. Operating from Cyprus and Greece, it funneled a surveillance product called Predator to a number of undemocratic regimes, among them Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Madagascar, Ukraine, and the UAE-backed Sudanese Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

The Greek government is also believed to have been among its clients. But unknown to it, Predator might have been providing Israel with a rich stream of intelligence on Greek political elites that could define the direction of the Greece–Israel alliance.

The 105 personalities targeted by the eavesdropping software make up some of Greece’s political, business, and military elites. Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis consistently denied that his government was behind the software’s purchase, despite Intellexa only selling its products to governments, and some of its employees working out of a Greek intelligence facility.

No public investigation was ever conducted into whether Predator contained a backdoor that could have granted a third party access to potentially compromising material. Yet the scandal unfolded at the same time that ties between Greece and Israel were becoming deeper than ever.

On 6 April 2026, Greece signed a €650 million ( around $767 million) arms deal with Israel, purchasing 36 rocket artillery launchers, precision-guided missiles with ranges up to 300 kilometers, loitering munitions, and a 10-year support package from Israel’s largest arms manufacturer, Elbit Systems.

In March, a state-of-the-art Greek frigate recently commissioned from France was pressed into service in support of the US-Israeli campaign against Iran, after a suspected Iranian drone targeted British bases on Cyprus – London confirmed the drone was not launched from Iranian territory.

Atlanticist military corridor in the MediterraneanGreece, Israel, and Cyprus were reported by local media in December to be forming a brigade-strength rapid reaction force that will patrol the Eastern Mediterranean in the triangle formed between the Greek island of Karpathos, Cyprus, and the Israeli coast.

While the development was officially denied, the three countries’ leaders signed a joint action plan for defense cooperation in the same month and pledged to step up joint air and naval exercises in 2026. Turkish politicians and media quickly began warning of an emerging anti-Turkiye axis in the eastern Mediterranean.

“Greece is following very risky policies, which no other European nation has followed, and can only lead to further insecurity, problems, and wars,” said Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan in a 12 April interview in reference to the alliance with Israel. “We’ve warned them.”

Athens insists the alliance is aimed at protecting shipping lanes, energy infrastructure, and undersea cables from Turkish pressure. In reality, the relationship has been formalized through the Washington-backed 3+1 Strategic Alliance and underwritten by three US laws passed between 2019 and 2026 covering defense, energy, and security cooperation in the eastern Mediterranean.

The architecture is designed to secure US-backed projects such as the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) and the Abraham Accords. Russia and Turkiye remain the implied targets.

The geography covered by the three allies includes flight routes used by military aircraft connecting Greece to West Asia. When joined to the logistical resupply route to Ukraine operated by the US from the port of Alexandroupoli in northern Greece, which bypasses the Turkish Straits, it creates a US-dominated geopolitical crossroads and an uninterrupted corridor between the two conflict zones in Ukraine and Asia’s western coastline, along the Gaza, Israel, and Lebanon front.

The US military base in Greece’s Souda Bay is strategically positioned at the center of several Mediterranean military flight routes originating in the US, UK, and Germany, which converge there for refueling before continuing eastwards.

Athanasios Platias, the president of the Greek Council for Foreign Relations and a professor of strategy at the University of Piraeus, tells The Cradle:

“Greece is just trying to maintain a balanced relationship with Israel, alongside its mutual defense pact with the UAE and the dispatch of Patriot missiles to Saudi Arabia to protect their oil fields. Greece and Cyprus are Israel’s lifelines to the west.”

The strategic depth offered by the alliance with Greece and Cyprus has witnessed Israeli aircraft being evacuated to those countries’ airports during intense Iranian bombardments, Israeli citizens and foreign tourists boarding boats to escape to Cyprus much as the Lebanese did during their 1975–1990 civil war, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s airplane being cleared to fly over their territory despite both being signatories to the International Criminal Court (ICC) which has an active arrest warrant against him.

British and American forces based out of several military bases on Cyprus and Greece have continued providing bombing, logistical, and intelligence support to Tel Aviv by sweeping the region for intercepts from a powerful radar on Mount Troodos, bombing the Ansarallah-aligned armed forces in Yemen from the Akrotiri Air Base, and supplying maintenance to US platforms in between offensive sorties. A Greek-manned Patriot battery in Saudi Arabia has been protecting oil facilities, and a state-of-the-art Greek frigate is providing additional anti-missile protection.

Greece’s long march into the Israeli campDespite being among the last western countries to recognize Israel in 1990, Greece and Israel have maintained ties for decades.

The Greek military junta made secret weapons purchases from Israel in the 1960s and discussed establishing joint armaments factories. The ties burgeoned in the 1990s through intelligence and military collaboration, before maturing to the point of being publicly announced in 2002.

In February 2010, the alliance was formalized through a staged chance meeting in a Moscow restaurant between former Greek prime minister George Papandreou and Netanyahu.

Initially, Netanyahu had hoped that Papandreou’s ties with former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad would help out with Israel’s relationship with Damascus. As the public climate in Turkiye turned against Israel, Israeli fighter jets began using Greek skies for practicing bombing runs on Iran.

For its part, Greece hoped that Israel could act as a counterweight to Ankara, but the ties also reflected a Greek fascination with the Israeli economic success story that was especially relevant at a time when Greece was embarking on its economic crisis.

Speaking to The Cradle, Nicolas Kosmatopoulos, an associate professor of politics and anthropology at the American University of Beirut, notes that the alliance was partially foisted upon Greece at the demand of its US ally:

“The two crucial dates when the Greek–Israeli relationship becomes tighter are 2002 and 2010, i.e., just before the Americans invaded Iraq and just as Greece was entering its economic crisis. In 2001, the Israelis had just been ejected from Lebanon, shrinking their strategic depth, and in 2010, Greece was forced into the alliance further through a financial bailout with geopolitical strings attached.”

In 2021, Greece signed an agreement with Washington expanding the number of Greek bases at its disposal. It had already become only the second country, aside from the US, to sign a Status of Forces Agreement with Israel, facilitating the basing of Israeli troops and aircraft on Greek soil.

The Greek minister of defense, who signed it controversially, noted that “should an Iranian missile strike the Aegean, it could mean the end of all the region’s countries.” Greece followed up in 2019 and again in 2021 with an expanded basing agreement for the US, deepening its Atlanticist mooring.

Supporters of the alliance in Athens believe that Tel Aviv will have Greece’s back in a potential confrontation with Turkiye.

“This wishful thinking has developed in Greece that Israel might get involved on Greece’s side in a confrontation with Turkiye,” says retired Lieutenant-General Kostantinos Loukopoulos. “This does not apply and is just an expression of a desire to have someone else fight one’s battles.”

One place where Greek and Israeli interests converge is on northern Cyprus, which has been occupied by Turkiye for nearly 50 years. Removing Turkish influence from the island would limit Ankara’s reach into the eastern Mediterranean and push back Turkish missile and air capabilities stationed there.

The Greek market has also become lucrative for Israeli defense companies. Israel Aerospace Industries’ acquisition of Greek firm Intracom Defense (IDE) in 2023 gave it access to EU defense funds reserved for European firms. Elbit built an international pilot training center in Kalamata in 2023, while Israel’s SK Group took control of the Hellenic Vehicle Industry in 2025.

US Proxies Vie for Their Place as ‘Israel’s’ Grip Slips

Athens is now negotiating a further € 3 billion (around $3.6 billion) deal for an Israeli-built multilayer air defense system known as Achilles’ Shield.

Shana Marshall, the associate director of George Washington University’s Middle East Center, explains to The Cradle:

“There’s been a big push in Israel recently to develop their industrial base outside the country, so they do not have to worry about a possible international arms embargo. They have been observing how the Emiratis wholesale buy foreign arms industries and relocate them to free zones dedicated to military industrial production, and are now mimicking them.”

The shipping oligarchs behind the allianceThe Greek-owned merchant fleet – one of the world’s largest – is facilitating deliveries. Two Greek shipowners have been using their fleets to transport energy and military cargoes to Israeli ports, according to a report by No Harbour For Genocide (NHG), as has national air-carrier Aegean Airlines, often without securing export permits.

“Greek ports and airports are being used for resupply and the transfer of materiel and fuel,” says Dimitris Plionis, member of the Greek chapter of the Boycott, Divest, Sanction (BDS) movement.

“Greece’s defense industry is collaborating with Israeli companies that test out their technology on Palestinian bodies; under American guidance, Greece has connected its policy since 2010 with war crimes and an apartheid state, and called this voluntary relationship a ‘strategic alliance.’”

Despite historically hailing from a cluster of Aegean islands as local traders and becoming dominant Mediterranean carriers during Ottoman times, Greek shipowners prefer to fly under flags of convenience, run their businesses from London, Hamburg, New York, or Singapore, and separate their priorities from those of the Greek state.

Prominent Greek shipowner Panos Laskaridis made headlines in 2021 when he stated that “the Greek government does what the Union of Shipowners tells them to do.”

“They have asked for and got their own ministry, which is literally theirs and not the Greek government’s,” a former high-ranking Greek official informs The Cradle. “They have the port of Piraeus, and constitutionally-secured tax immunity since 1952 … And they used to control the Greek Classification Society, which helped them by judging their ships to be seaworthy.”

“Ship-owners are the taxi drivers of international trade,” says Platias. “They don’t take orders from any government and will work with China, Russia, or the USA: basically whoever signals the higher fare will get their ride.”

Blowback from a losing orderGreece traditionally maintained strong ties with the Arab world, and its turn toward Israel has never been especially popular domestically.

Athens has witnessed large pro-Palestinian protests since Operation Al-Aqsa Flood. At the same time, growing competition between China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the US-backed IMEC corridor has turned the eastern Mediterranean into a battleground over trade, energy, and logistics.

The Greece–Israel alliance now functions as one more mechanism for defending US influence in the region.

“Through these wars, the Americans have moved the planet’s energy center-of-gravity from Eurasia to the two shores of the Atlantic,” argues Platias.

“Whether through Ukraine knocking out 40 percent of the Russian oil industry, or the mutual blows struck on both sides of the Persian Gulf, the Eurasian energy system is badly hit, and that is to the benefit of American energy dominance.”

The Abraham Accords era accelerated Greece’s alignment with Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

When Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS) visited Athens in July 2022, Greece became the first western state to openly rehabilitate the royal after the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The visit produced an estimated €4 billion (around 4.7 billion) in agreements covering military cooperation, data cables, and electricity interconnections.

A few months earlier, Saudi money entered the Greek media industry. MBC Group acquired a 30 percent stake in Antenna, one of Greece’s largest television networks.

When it launched in 1989, Antenna was the first private Greek channel. Founded by a shipping magnate, it set a pattern for shipping interests like the Alafouzos, Marinakis, and Vardinogiannis families owning large Greek media groups and using them to selectively apply pressure on successive governments.

Antenna soon emerged as the most pro-US channel in the Greek mediascape. Amid talk of a Greek port becoming the destination for the US-supported IMEC trade corridor, it signed a deal with the Atlantic Council think tank for an annual conference bringing Arab and European politicians, investors, and policymakers to Athens.

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair was hired as an advisor, and Italy’s GEDI Gruppo Editoriale controversially purchased the outlet. The move raised concerns in Italy about editorial independence, which the company sought to address by declaring its commitment to free speech. Around the same time, Antenna hired Elizabeth Pipco – an Orthodox Jewish model and online personality who supports US President Donald Trump, and a one-time spokeswoman for the Republican Party – to provide pro-Israel, MAGA-themed commentary on world events in its evening news broadcast.

The US is exploring ways of rewarding Greece for the facilitation of its war against Iran, by possibly moving more US troops there from European countries that did not permit Washington to operate offensively from their territory.

But Athens also appears to be feeling the heat of supporting an unpopular war, with Greek Prime Minister Mitsotakis noting last week that Israel’s war in Lebanon is “completely counterproductive” and that “friends need to speak truth to friends.”

“We’ve now got to a stage where Greece is in danger of suffering very great repercussions from the position it has chosen to follow in the war against Iran,” contends Petros Papakostantinou, a journalist and author of 10 books on technology and geopolitics.

“Firstly, because the world economy is not going well and Greece is vulnerable to its astronomical debt; secondly, because Greek shipping is extremely dependent on the straits of Hormuz; and thirdly, because if Israel manages to destroy Iran, Greece will be the first European country against which a massive refugee wave and perhaps also terrorism will crash.”

With US and Israeli prestige having suffered during the campaign against Iran, Athens may find itself politically exposed. Not only by attracting the increased ire of regional powers like Turkiye, Iran, and Russia, but also in terms of a diplomatic downgrading in the emerging new order.

One international negotiator speaking to The Cradle on condition of anonymity due to ongoing projects in Greece observes:

“[The] Trust of Americans is blown out of the park in the wake of this disastrous war. If Turkiye is to take them seriously, the Greeks will have to come up with a more sophisticated foreign policy and bring something to the table, possibly in Syria or Lebanon, where they still have some agency.”

Intellexa’s private jet no longer flies out of Athens, but it may already have helped lock Greece into an alliance that is becoming harder to defend, more expensive to sustain, and more dangerous to escape. “Intellexa and other companies selling Israeli-developed surveillance software are controlled by the Israeli state and deal only with state entities,” says Loukopoulos. “If information was derived through Predator, that’s a crime; if it didn’t remain in Greece and might be used as blackmail material, then that’s a double crime.”

Iason Athanasiadis is a Greek writer, photographer, political analyst, and television producer specializing in the Middle East and Southeast Europe.

(The Cradle)


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

3
 
 

This Thursday, Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez signed the Organic Law of Mines into effect. During the signing, she welcomed Venezuela’s reinstatement in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) after years of illegal exclusion. However, she clarified on Friday that her government does not have an indebtedness program planned.

Accompanied by Vice President for Economy and Finance Calixto Ortega and Minister for Economy and Finance Anabel Pereira, the acting president sealed a new chapter in the management of Venezuela’s mining resources. The event included participation of workers from various mining unions, state delegates, the private sector, and small producers, who were connected via satellite from the Manuel Carlos Piar Mining Complex in Bolívar state.

This new law not only strengthens the state’s authority over mineral resources but also establishes mechanisms to ensure that mining is carried out in accordance with the highest standards of environmental protection, workplace safety, and social responsibility.

The enactment of the law represents a significant step forward in consolidating a mining model while guaranteeing the interests of the state, investors, and—as a priority—local communities and small producers.

Venezuela back in the IMF
Rodríguez also greeted and thanked United States President Donald Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for progress toward Venezuela’s full reintegration into the global financial system. For Rodríguez, this has been a great achievement of Venezuelan diplomacy and of all the governments that allowed the IMF to reinstate Venezuela as a full member with all rights.

“I welcome the diplomatic dialogue with the US government, I salute and thank President Donald Trump, Secretary Marco Rubio, and all the teams that were involved in this process of seeking the normalization of Venezuela’s representation in the International Monetary Fund,” said the acting president.

Rodríguez thanked the head of the agency, Kristalina Georgieva, for her efforts, stressing that this step is vital for strengthening and stabilizing the Venezuelan economy and its strategic role in the region. She also thanked the countries that collaborated throughout the process, including the United Arab Emirates, Brazil, and Qatar.

Each advance in this direction represents a firm step towards economic normalization and Venezuela’s economic recovery. These developments are the product of an active diplomatic agenda and sustained cooperation with the US government.

On Friday, the acting president clarified that Venezuela does not have an indebtedness program planned following the resumption of relations with the IMF, which were interrupted seven years ago.

“We do not have any indebtedness program planned… The recovery of our representation in this international organization is very important; it is great news for Venezuela,” she noted during a cultural government activity, broadcast by the public channel Venezolana de Televisión (VTV).

For nearly a decade, since the US strengthened its illegal sanctions against Venezuela, the country was stripped of its rights as an IMF member, including access to over $5 billion in Special Drawing Rights (SDR). This was part of a US-led operation aiming to harm the Venezuelan people and provoke a regime change, which eventually failed due to the Venezuelan people’s resistance.

Far right opposition
Rodríguez also condemned extremist far-right sectors in Venezuela for attempting to obstruct the normalization of relations between Venezuela and the IMF. “It is very regrettable, I must say responsibly: it is very regrettable that Venezuelan extremists took it upon themselves to visit capitals in Europe and other countries to try to prevent this crucial step for our economy,” the acting president stated.

Following the IMF’s announcement regarding the resumption of relations with Venezuela, the Venezuelan government welcomed the news. The administration hailed the move as a victory for diplomacy and the dialogue process with the US government.

Venezuela and Cuba Celebrate 23 Years of the Barrio Adentro Medical Mission

The recognition of the truth about Venezuela has been essential in driving these initiatives and opening new avenues for collaboration. Obtaining these banking licenses not only facilitates interaction between Venezuelan financial institutions and their international counterparts but also lays the foundation for a more robust economic future.

(Alba Ciudad) with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/SF


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

4
 
 

Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez led the signing of an agreement between the state-owned Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) and the US company Chevron to exchange energy assets. This step is expected to have a certain impact on Venezuela’s energy market.

The agreement includes the transfer of a license for a gas field to Venezuela in exchange for the incorporation of the Ayacucho 8 block, located in the Orinoco Oil Belt, into the production for PetroPiar, Chevron’s joint venture with PDVSA.

“This exchange agreement… will allow us to make significant progress in terms of production,” said Rodríguez, adding that the income derived from that production will go “directly to the benefit of the people of Venezuela.”

Como parte de los avances en nuestra agenda energética, celebramos la firma de nuevos acuerdos entre PDVSA y el Ministerio de Hidrocarburos con Chevron. Estas nuevas alianzas nos permitirán elevar la producción petrolera y dirigir esos ingresos al bienestar de los venezolan@s. pic.twitter.com/usXQexd4jE

— Delcy Rodríguez (@delcyrodriguezv) April 14, 2026

Rodríguez also said that “Chevron has been in Venezuela for more than a century,” and that the company “can serve as an example,” because “in the worst moments, they remained in the country and, today, they show clear signs of continuing to move forward.”

The acting president further emphasized the need to “move toward a Venezuela without sanctions” and to provide “institutional legal security to investors coming to Venezuela.” She stated that this is not “a fleeting or momentary investment, but rather we are betting on the future.”

Major challenges for achievable goals
Werther Sandoval, an expert in the Venezuelan oil sector, told Sputnik that, although the precise details of the agreement have not been disclosed, “an increase in oil production is expected, and probably before the deadline set by Chevron itself, as Venezuela has wells in deferred production that require investment.”

“The most delicate problem is PDVSA’s electrical system, affected by the US blockade and in need of investment,” the analyst said. This is relevant in the context of the current US sanctions, which, as Rodríguez stated, should be lifted to ensure full legal security for investors.

“Venezuela currently hovers around a million barrels [per day], with ups and downs,” said Sandoval. “Chevron has the capacity for higher production in the four companies where it participates. It has just increased its stake from 30% to 49% in one of them, which shows its interest in the ultra-heavy crude, necessary for its refineries on the Mexican Gulf coast.”

“An increase in production between 260,000 and 390,000 barrels seems conservative and achievable to me,” he added.

He further stated that, according to statements by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Washington’s interest is not only in oil but also in “geopolitical control to reduce space for energy companies from other countries.”

“A very significant game of tensions is shaping up, where the Venezuelan government must act delicately, always favoring national interests and respecting agreements with its major allies,” commented the expert.

Delcy Rodríguez Urges US to Lift Illegal Sanctions, Calls for ‘Maturity’ in Bilateral Relations

The president of Chevron in Venezuela, Javier La Rosa, described the asset exchange as the first step of a new stage aimed at strengthening energy cooperation between Washington and Caracas.

Chevron’s increased participation contrasts with other multinationals. ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips are engaged in international litigation against Venezuela over expropriations carried out during the term of former President Hugo Chávez. These processes have resulted in the immobilization of PDVSA’s assets in the Caribbean and Europe.

For Venezuela, the agreement represents an injection of capital and technology into a sector whose production has decreased from a peak of 3.2 million barrels per day in 2008 to current levels of nearly one million barrels per day. As Sandoval summarized, the expectations are conservative but achievable, as long as the challenge of electrical infrastructure is addressed and the Venezuelan authorities carefully navigate the complex geopolitical landscape.

(Sputnik)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/SF


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

5
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Note: As President Claudia Sheinbaum is in Barcelona, Spain, today’s press conference was headed by Minister of the Interior Rosa Icela Rodríguez.

Mexico places social agenda center stage at global summitMinister of the Interior Rosa Icela Rodríguez reported that President Claudia Sheinbaum traveled to Barcelona for the Summit in Defense of Democracy, at the invitation of Spain’s president. In meetings with heads of state such as Lula from Brazil and Petro from Colombia, Mexico will present a clear stance: “for the good of all, the poor come first,” as the guiding principle of a democracy with social justice, along with a message of peace, international cooperation, and strengthening multilateralism from the Global South.

Culture as a right: new law and AI protectionThe Film and Audiovisual Law was approved. The new legislation represents a historic updating positioning culture as a people’s right. The reform ensures exhibition conditions, expands platform presence, decentralizes support, and protects cultural heritage. At the same time, a reform is being promoted to shield creators from artificial intelligence, based on the consideration that “voice and image are part of artistic creation and cannot be used without authorization.”

Mexico cooperates with UN without yielding to its conclusionsMinister Rosa Icela affirmed that the Mexican government maintains constant collaboration with the UN, despite disagreeing with its report on enforced disappearances. She was emphatic: “we do not agree with its conclusions, that doesn’t change, but we will continue working hand in hand” with the commission that drafted the report.

She noted ongoing coordination in searching for missing persons and announced that advances and results will be presented next week, reiterating openness to dialogue with collectives of victims’ family members and international organizations.

Moral economy: stability with social agreementCoordination continues between government and business leaders to promote the PACIC anti-inflation package. The government noted that there is a “very favorable disposition to meet the demand of not raising prices of basic foods,” consolidating a strategy that protects Mexicans’ pocketbook.

Electoral reform: constitutional transformationIt was confirmed that the electoral reform is now constitutional and nearing publication, closing the cycle of changes and amendments. As stated, “no other legal move is foreseen,” thereby consolidating a transformation aimed at reducing privileges, making the system more efficient, and strengthening democracy based on the organized people.


The post People’s Mañanera April 17 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

6
 
 

This article by Aurelio Sánchez originally appeared in the April 16, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

The head of government, Clara Brugada Molina, acknowledged that the Metro Collective Transportation System continues to experience failures; however, she assured that her administration is allocating a historic investment to address them between 2025 and 2026.

During the distribution of aid from the Universal Citizen Income program for men aged 57 to 59, Brugada highlighted that the Metro receives a budget of nearly 50 billion pesos, in addition to maintaining a significant subsidy for users.

“Yes, it has flaws like any other subway system in the world, but we are investing like never before. Billions of pesos are going into the Metro. Each trip costs the government 13 pesos, and we decided that it should cost the people five pesos,” she stated.

From the Magdalena Mixhuca Sports Center, Brugada Molina emphasized that this system is the “heart of mobility” in the capital, and therefore requires not only maintenance, but a complete renovation.

In that regard, she announced that once the 2026 World Cup is over, they will begin the complete rehabilitation of Line 3, which runs from Indios Verdes to Universidad.

“It doesn’t just need maintenance, it needs a complete overhaul, line by line. After the World Cup, we’re going to renovate Line 3 so that it has no breakdowns and deliver practically a brand new Metro,” she stated.

At the same event, the Mexico City government reported progress on the Universal Citizen Income social program for people aged 57 to 59, which provides support of two thousand pesos every two months.

During the day, 20,694 new beneficiaries were added , bringing the total number of registered beneficiaries for 2025-2026 to 107,610. Currently, the program has 77,674 active beneficiaries, of whom 48,676 are women and 28,997 are men.

The goal for 2026 is to reach 155,000 beneficiaries, with current coverage at 23.04 percent of the total population of 337,019 people in that age range in Mexico City. It was also reported that the program prioritizes people aged 59 and over, a group that has reached 70.8 percent coverage.

The capital’s authorities reiterated that this type of support is part of the social policy promoted by the current administration to expand rights and improve the living conditions of the population.

Subway Union Speaks Out Against Working Overtime

Subway workers belonging to the National Union of Workers of the Collective Transportation System declared that they would not work overtime, starting last Friday, in the technical and operational areas of all lines.

In a statement, the union indicated that this caused delays in the operation of lines 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and B because not all scheduled trains will be running.

The previous decision, they said, was due to “the lack of response to real and immediate solutions” to their requests, such as the lack of supplies to work with, among other things.

That day, the general director of the Metro, Adrián Rubalcaba Suárez, asked for understanding from users for the delays that have occurred that day due to the decision of the union members not to work overtime, thereby affecting the frequency of trains on all lines.

“We understand the impact this is having on users right now, and we ask for a little patience,” he said.

The post CDMX’ Brugada Confirms Problems with Metro, Allocates 50 Billion MXN for Rehabilitation appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

7
 
 

Amid the war in the Middle East, which is causing a record increase in fuel prices, China has increased its exports of electric vehicles. According to Bloomberg, exports abroad surged by 140 percent compared to the previous year, reaching 349,000 units.

This growth is understandable. Consumers are looking for electric cars to protect themselves from sudden increases in fuel prices.

Europe, one of the regions most affected by the crisis, risks suffering a severe blow to its industry after many years of attempts to curb the entry of Chinese cars into its market.

However, the damage could affect not only Europe but also one of the parties involved in the conflict: the United States, where Donald Trump also distrusts the Chinese automotive industry.

Europe losing the competition
Chinese manufacturers are rapidly consolidating their position in Europe. Imports of cars manufactured in China to the European Union in 2025 increased by 30.7 percent compared to the previous year, reaching 1.006 million vehicles, according to a report published in April by the European Automobile Manufacturers Association.

The report highlights the increasing competitiveness of Chinese brands, especially in electric and hybrid models. China even surpassed its competitors from Japan and South Korea in sales. Although the figures on the impact of the crisis in the Persian Gulf on these indicators are not yet known, the trend points to an increase in the market share of Chinese vehicles.

A Chinese EV exhibition. Photo: Getty Images.

A Chinese EV exhibition. Photo: Getty Images.

European authorities have long expressed concern. In 2024, the European Union imposed tariffs of up to 35.3 percent on Chinese electric vehicles, in addition to the standard 10 percent rate. However, given the strong sales growth, these measures do not appear to have achieved their intended effect.

At the same time, European manufacturers are doing everything possible to maintain their foothold in China, a key market for their products. According to the report, EU car exports to China fell by 43 percent in value last year, to €8.3 billion ($9.7 billion), while shipment volumes dropped by 42.8 percent, to 159,743 units.

Trump’s premature joy
In this context, US President Donald Trump highlighted the problems of his European partners in a recent interview. “They are ruining Europe because they are taking a lot of business away from Mercedes and BMW, etc.,” he claimed. “In our country, we don’t have any Chinese cars because they would have wiped out General Motors and Ford.” He added that he imposed “a 100 percent tariff on Chinese cars.” “We don’t have a single Chinese car in the entire country,” he said.

However, Trump might be underestimating the situation. As part of the trade agreement signed in January with Beijing, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed to reduce tariffs on 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles from 100 percent to 6.1 percent during the first year of the pact’s validity. The quota will increase to 70,000 units per year by 2030. The Carney government has also expressed its desire to create joint ventures with Chinese manufacturers.

Why Has China Remained Stable Amid Soaring Global Oil Prices?: People’s Daily Rui Ping

Given the small size of the Canadian market, the prime minister’s expectations appear focused on exporting those vehicles.

“Canadians are welcome to visit the United States in their new Chinese [electric vehicles], but if they think they are going to sell them here, that’s not going to happen,” US Ambassador to Ottawa Pete Hoekstra told The Hill.

Considering that European tariffs failed to curb the flow of Chinese cars, the US decided to take preventive measures. Former President Joe Biden’s January 2025 regulation prohibits the use of Chinese and Russian components and software in vehicles.

However, Chinese cars can still enter the US market, something Trump himself admitted. In January, he told the Detroit Economic Club that he is willing to allow Chinese manufacturers to build factories in the United States. Ford has hinted that it would be open to forming a joint venture with a Chinese automotive company.

“Their price [of Chinese cars] and the quality of their vehicles are far superior to what I see in the West. We are in a global competition with China, and it’s not just about electric vehicles. And if we lose this, we have no future at Ford,” declared Ford CEO Jim Farley last year.

Although US manufacturers have surpassed Japanese and other foreign competitors on more than one occasion, the Chinese industry could become an insurmountable challenge.

(RT)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/SH


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

8
 
 

This article by Jessika Becerra originally appeared in the April 17, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) acknowledged that one of its pipelines was the cause of the spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and therefore removed three officials from their positions.

At a press conference, Víctor Rodríguez Padilla, CEO of PEMEX, explained that the spill, which appeared as a large slick on February 6, originated from a leak in a 36-inch pipeline in the platform area of ​​the petrochemical complex located in Abkatún.

The cause, he said, was failures in the protocols, so the Agency for Safety, Energy and Environment (ASEA) has filed a criminal complaint with the Attorney General’s Office against whoever is responsible for what happened last February.

At the press conference of the Interinstitutional Group, it was reported that a criminal complaint has already been filed with the Attorney General’s Office (FGR). Photo: Roberto García Ortiz

While the prosecutor’s office and the internal control body carry out the corresponding investigations, the deputy director of safety, health at work and environmental protection; the marine control coordinator and the head of spills and waste, whose names were withheld at the conference, are being removed from their positions within PEMEX.

However, according to information from PEMEX’s website, the first position was filled by Miguel Ángel Miranda Mendoza. The others could not be identified.

“The incident didn’t happen on a platform; it was on a pipeline, a 36-inch pipeline. That’s where the leak occurred. It’s located in an area of ​​platforms, specifically the Abkatún-Pol-Chuc field, which has three oil fields in three different zones,” Rodríguez stated at a press conference regarding the progress of the oil spill investigation.

“We are reviewing the situation because something went wrong in the information chain. If we had immediately realized the magnitude of the incident, we would have acted accordingly, but it was detected as a minor incident. That’s how it was declared, but something failed in the protocols, which is indeed our main task; we have been reviewing all of those protocols,” he said.

The Interinstitutional Group on the presence of hydrocarbons detected on the coasts of the Gulf of Mexico reported at the conference that no mass death of any of the species on the coasts of that place has been observed due to the spill of February 6.

“The Gulf of Mexico is home to approximately 11,300 species of flora and fauna. We have attended to some organisms that have arrived, including 13 turtles contaminated with hydrocarbons, 12 of which were deceased. And I want to emphasize that we have not observed any mass die-offs of any of the species recorded for the Gulf of Mexico,” stated Marina Robles García, Undersecretary of Biodiversity and Environmental Restoration at the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources.

He explained that nine protected natural areas were monitored and that of the 4,697 hectares of coral reviewed, most showed no traces of hydrocarbons.

Direct Support to Fishing Sector & Communities

At the event, Luz Elena González, Secretary of Energy, mentioned that direct attention has been maintained to the communities and the fishing sector and that through the Community and Environment Support Program, PEMEX will allocate 30 million pesos to support fishing cooperatives in Veracruz.

He noted that during the Easter holiday period, the state’s beaches remained in suitable condition for visitors, without significant impacts on tourist traffic, resulting in a hotel occupancy rate of nearly 80 percent.

For his part, Raymundo Pedro Morales Ángeles, Secretary of the Navy, stated that the beaches are in a continuous process of cleaning, with daily work that has allowed them to be kept in adequate condition.

“It is important to point out that the waste that is still being collected corresponds to remnants that arrive gradually, derived from the natural dynamics of the sea,” he said.

He stated that 48 beaches along the coast have been attended to and that as a result of the operational deployment on the Gulf of Mexico coast, 915 tons of waste composed of hydrocarbon mixed with sand, driftwood and sargassum have been collected to date.

Based on the analysis of the logs and the cross-referencing of information that revealed findings, the CEO of PEMEX filed a complaint with the Attorney General’s Office and the Anti-Corruption and Good Governance Secretariat.

Among the irregularities detected were a loss of mechanical integrity and the repair of an oil pipeline whose activities were not reported to the general director or the senior management of the state-owned company.

This hydrocarbon leak at PEMEX facilities had been systematically denied by operational areas, especially in March, when oil spills began arriving on the coasts of the Gulf of Mexico.

There is a match between the location where the loss of integrity of the oil pipeline was detected and the site located by scientists as the origin of the oil trail observed in the satellite images.

Oily water recovered from the containment barriers, at least 350 cubic meters, was hidden.

There was a contradiction between a simple “tearing” and the large deployment of 11 ships in total that were used to contain, recover and disperse the hydrocarbons that escaped from the pipeline.

In addition to these irregularities, there was the decision not to cut off the flow completely to limit the duration and magnitude of the spill.

The main valve was shut off on February 14, eight days after the leak was detected.

Last March, Rocío Nahle, governor of Veracruz and Secretary of Energy in the previous six-year term, downplayed the magnitude of the environmental impact of the spill.

He also said it was caused by a private vessel, whose concession for exploration and exploitation was granted during the administration of PRI member Enrique Peña Nieto. Later, he backtracked on his statements.

The post PEMEX Pipeline Caused Gulf of Mexico Spill; Three Officials Dismissed appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

9
 
 

By Kit Klarenberg – Apr 15, 2026

Kit Klarenberg argues that Hezbollah’s battlefield resilience has derailed “Greater Israel” ambitions, exposing Israeli overreach and strategic exhaustion. “Israel’s” war reveals a recurring pattern of miscalculation, where military escalation produces diminishing returns for Tel Aviv.

On April 8th, the Zionist entity struck a demonic blow to the heart of Beirut, dropping 1,000 pound bombs in densely packed residential areas, killing untold civilians and injuring many more. One of Lebanon’s most dire mass-killings since the end of the 2024 Israeli aggression on the country, it marked the resumption of “Israel’s” avowedly genocidal invasion. With bombs raining down apace even as rare in-person talks between the pair are being carried out, Zionist Occupation Force-backed settlers are moving quickly to establish a permanent presence in the country’s south.

Whatever abrupt pause in the war on Iran is sustained by duelling blockades of the Strait Of Hormuz must be viewed in the context of the Zionist entity’s longstanding determination to annex Lebanese territory, in service of ‘Greater Israel’. Tel Aviv’s criminal incursion ignitedMarch 16th, Orwellianly dubbed by officials a “targeted ground operation against key targets.” It was not until10 days later that major news outlets deigned to call it an invasion.

OnMarch 23rd, Tel Aviv’s finance minister Bezalel Smotrich – aself-proclaimed fascist – made “Israel’s” objectives unambiguously clear. He urged the ZOF to formally annex southern Lebanon. Since then, over a million people have been displaced, thousands killed, and civilian infrastructure razed en masse. While a significant chunk of the country is now occupied, the cost for Tel Aviv was substantial. Unrelenting Hezbollah fire producedheavy casualties and record equipment and vehicle losses, including 21 Merkava main battle tanks in a single day onMarch 26th.

On April 2nd, Israeli media openly advertised the impending ceasefire in the war on Iran. It was revealed the Zionist entity was preparing to intensify its air campaign against Lebanon, due to the enormous damage inflicted upon the ZOF by the Resistance. Tel Aviv reportedly planned to “[reduce] the current focus on Iran,” in order to support “Israeli ground forces attempting to seize Lebanese territory.” Were it not for hell being unleashed from the skies, the ZOF would currently be in big trouble.

OnApril 5th, the ZOF’s Northern Command chief admitted Tel Aviv had grossly overestimated damage inflicted upon Hezbollah during its October 2024 invasion of Lebanon. The entity’s political and military chiefs had long claimed the Resistance faction was obliterated by the illegal intervention. TheZOF estimated 70 – 80% of Hezbollah’s rocket capabilities were destroyed during the 2024 war. This reverie was comprehensively shattered by hundreds of the group’s projectiles targeting Tel Aviv daily, throughout the Zionist-American war on Iran.

No wonder that conflict is now on hold. Hezbollah remains a redoubtable adversary, which can independently, and in tandem with its Resistance comrades, thwart Tel Aviv’s annexation of Lebanese territory, andpermanently expel Zionist settlers from northern Palestine. This wreaks havoc with “Greater Israel’s” construction, which Benjamin Netanyahuopenly yearns to be his enduring political legacy, and literal ‘get out of jail free’ card. Hence, southern Lebanon must be annexed, and Hezbollah neutralised. But attempting to do so will, as before, end in fatal catastrophe.

‘Forced Expulsions’
In June 1982, Zionist militants invaded Lebanon, ostensibly to drive Palestinian freedom fighters away from the entity’s claimed northern border. Quickly, it became apparent ethnic cleansing, massacres, and land theft were the ZOF’s true goal. As a declassified July 1983 US National Intelligence Council assessment noted, ultra-Zionists then as now were calling for all-out annexation of Lebanon’s south. Which is precisely what temporarily came to pass, until Hezbollah drove the ZOF out decisively in 2000. Along the way, obvious lessons weren’t learned by Tel Aviv.

The Council correctly predicted the ZOF would create a puppet state in the south, to fulfill “some day-to-day governing tasks,” while “real power will remain in Israeli hands.” Despite judging the costs “of semi-permanent occupation” to be “not inconsequential,” they were perceived as “manageable”, due to the entity’s “proven track record” of suppressing “unrest” in territory it illegally occupies. “Forced expulsions, use of local surrogates, and ruthless counterintelligence operations” by the ZOF were forecast, which the NIC believed would negate “increasingly” hostile local opposition.

“If, as expected, the IDF gets a handle on the guerrillas in the next six – 12 months, domestic unease will decline,” the NIC concluded. This assessment couldn’t have been more wrong. Unmentioned by the Council, Hezbollah was quickly founded following the Zionist entity’s invasion. Inspired by the Islamic Revolution and assisted by the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps, the group rapidly gained in strength, spreading revolutionary fervour among Lebanese citizens of every faith, until forcibly purging ZOF militants from Lebanon outright in May 2000.

Hezbollah’s success – repeated with an unprecedented battering of Zionist invasion forces in 2006 – inspired new generations of Resistance fighters, including Hamas. Today, the faction is the most popular and potent political and social force in Lebanon, embraced by citizens of every faith. Bashar Assad’s fall also did not, contrary to widely-held assumptions, make it remotely difficult for Iran to equip and coordinate with Hezbollah. A failure to comprehend these inconvenient truths has led the Zionist entity into disastrous ruin in Lebanon, yet again.

OnMarch 27th, ZOF chief of staff Eyal Zamir issued a grave warning during a security cabinet meeting. Namely, “Israel’s” military “is going to collapse in on itself,” due to “mounting operational demands and a deepening manpower shortage,” which could rapidly prove catastrophic. Already, an infantry battalion intended to be deployed to Lebanon had been redirected to the West Bank, to “keep the peace” as armed settlers carry out violent if not murderous attacks on Palestinians. The ZOF would’ve struggled to field further forces there.

Then on April 3rd, the ZOF openly admitted “its goal of disarming Hezbollah…is unrealistic, as it would require the military to launch a full-scale invasion of Lebanon,” which it wasn’t able to wage. In other words, Hezbollah was undefeated, and Lebanese territory couldn’t be stolen. Having been engaged in perpetual, multi-front war since October 7th, 2023, the exhausted Zionist entity lacked the muscle to achieve its Lebanese goals while alsotargeting Iran, dangerously contrary to intelligence, military and political forecasts.

Hezbollah’s Chief: ‘Lebanese Resistance Will Not Surrender, The Battlefield Will Speak’

‘Living Room’
“Israel” was so ruinously overextended attempting to wage war on the Resistance – without Ansar Allah even having fully joined the fight – it was reportedly considering an extraordinary, desperate solution. Namely, inviting Syria’sMI6-installed extremist government to battle Hezbollah. Ahmad al-Sharaa’s regime is maintained in power exclusively via a brutal, repressive domestic security and military apparatus. Forces could not be deployed in sufficient numbers to counter Hezbollah without risking major domestic upheaval. However, Israeli outlet Maarivreported on April 5th that this novel solution was being seriously considered:

“Only two actors want to fight Hezbollah – Israel and the new Syrian regime headed by al-Sharaa. According to Israeli officials, this is an intersecting interest, even if not an alliance in the classical sense. As far as Israel is concerned, this is a regime that hates Hezbollah, sees it as an enemy, and may actually become a partner of interests in the Lebanese arena…Understandings between Israel and Syria will be formed.”

Under the auspices of these “understandings”, the ZOF would “take over southern Lebanon, while the Syrians will act in northern Lebanon against Hezbollah.” However, the Empire reportedly “very much [preferred] not to reach such a scenario.” After all, it would be a deeply hazardous Faustian bargain, imperilling al-Sharaa’s already brittle rule. While he and his army of ISIS fighters may detest Hezbollah, the overwhelming majority of Syrians reject an alliance with “Israel” at a time when local Resistance elements are growing in strength.

A key source of al-Sharaa’s domestic unpopularity is his relentless, servile quest for cordial relations with Tel Aviv. Behind-closed-doors talks that began upon his December 2024 seizure of power culminatedthis January with the signing of a “joint mechanism”. Through it, Syria and “Israel” were to share intelligence, and peaceably resolve grievances old and new. This astonishing capitulation by al-Sharaa laid the foundations for formal normalisation of relations between the two, which successive Syrian governmentssteadfastly refused ever since “Israel’s” creation.

However, during al-Sharaa’sflying visit to London in late March, he revealed how despite positive “direct and indirect dialogue,” the Zionist entity “changed its mind at the last minute,” and normalization remains unforthcoming. The reasons for this sudden change of heart weren’t stated. One explanation could be that for all al-Sharaa’s eager subjugation of his country and government to “Israel”, he opposes Netanyahu’s insatiable expansionism. In September 2025, al-Sharaa cautioned other countries in West Asia could be affected by Tel Aviv’s deranged “Greater Israel” designs.

With Hezbollah supposedly dismantled, and Syria at last transformed into a doting Anglo-American puppet state, “Greater Israel” could be advanced without hindrance – or so Netanyahu thought. In reality, the “great opportunity” about which he boasted from the Golan Heights following Bashar al-Assad’s fall has become a dangerous trap. While al-Sharaa’s contempt for Hezbollah makes for a marriage of convenience, relying on Syria to deal with the group would inevitably boomerang on both parties spectacularly.

As history old and new amply shows, the Empire and its Zionist proxy underestimate Ansar Allah, Hezbollah, Iran, and the wider Resistance at their immense peril – but persist in doing so. Over and again across decades, the same failed strategies have been applied without success, and aren’t subsequently revised. The Empire’s crushing past defeats by the Resistance are spun as victories, and/or promptly forgotten about. All along though, in the real world, the Zionist-American military machine is ever-weakened, and Palestine’s long-overdue liberation grows irresistibly closer.

(Al Mayadeen)


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

10
 
 

The US military seizes the 2nd oil tanker in the Indian Ocean linked to Venezuela.


From Presstv via This RSS Feed.

11
 
 

The authorities of Venezuela and Cuba paid tribute to the 23rd anniversary of the launch of the Barrio Adentro Medical Mission on Thursday, April 16, with a floral offering at the shrine of Liberator Simón Bolívar in Caracas, Venezuela. Cuban Ambassador to Venezuela Jorge Mayo and Venezuelan Deputy Minister for Health Mauricio Vega led the ceremony commemorating the creation of this social program, born from the vision of Presidents Hugo Chávez and Fidel Castro.

The Barrio Adentro Mission is the Bolivarian Revolution’s structural response to the dehumanization of the neoliberal model, which treats health as a commodity. This program, enshrined in Article 83 of the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, constitutes the Venezuelan state’s obligation to guarantee the right to life through public policies of collective social welfare.

The Cuban ambassador called the Barrio Adentro Mission “an exemplary and popular mission that embodies the ideal of integration of the peoples.” The Venezuelan Deputy Minister spoke about the roots of the program, when Cuban doctors went door to door in marginalized communities across Venezuela to set up clinics.

The timeline of this social policy reveals a constant expansion of specialized services that were previously inaccessible to the majority. Since its founding in 2003 by President Hugo Chávez, the mission has achieved historic milestones despite the illegal US sanctions and economic blockade.
With the creation of Misión Milagro in 2004—which provided specialized services to restore eyesight—and the inauguration of Comprehensive Diagnostic Centers, Comprehensive Rehabilitation Centers, and High Technology Centers, Venezuela has been able to decentralize high-complexity medical care.

These advances were reinforced with the launch of the National Program for the Training of Comprehensive Community Medicine, which in 2011 graduated its first cohort of doctors: professionals trained with an ethic of social service and community commitment, fundamental pillars to withstand the impact of unilateral coercive measures.

In the last decade, during the administration of President Nicolás Maduro, the mission achieved the historic goal of 100 percent coverage across the entire national territory, integrating cutting-edge programs such as the Humanized Birth Plan and the National Genetics Center.

During the COVID-19 emergency of 2020, the joint effort of the Cuban Medical Mission and Venezuelan personnel led to the completion of 116 million screenings—an unprecedented figure in Latin America that helped Venezuela contain the pandemic through primary care.

Cuba Denies US Medicare Fraud Allegations

At 23 years, the mission reaffirms its enduring and supportive nature through constant participation in massive popular planning in the health sector. After more than two decades of uninterrupted work, there are over 10,000 operational health institutions and a historic total of 1.6 billion consultations carried out, making it a robust public system against external aggressions.

Currently, the Venezuelan government promotes medical training and the use of new technologies such as ozone therapy, demonstrating that health sovereignty is a tool of liberation strengthened through the unity of peoples.

The Cuban Medical Mission emphasized that in these 23 years, Cuban healthcare personnel have saved the lives of more than 1.49 million Venezuelans, demonstrating the success of binational solidarity. The Venezuelan government also highlighted the importance of teaching in the training of new Venezuelan doctors who today join this humanitarian task.

The commemorations will continue on Friday, April 17, with an event at the Latin American School of Medicine, reaffirming the commitment to continue liberating the homeland through health and solidarity.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/SH


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

12
 
 

The U.S. blockade is the main cause of the suffering of the Cuban nation.

On Thursday, Cubans commemorated the 65th anniversary of the proclamation of the socialist character of the Revolution with mass events in several cities across the country.

In Havana, President Miguel Diaz-Canel rejected the hostility of the U.S. government, which has maintained an economic, commercial and financial blockade for more than six decades.

He also rejected growing threats of military aggression that are accompanied by a cynical narrative according to which Cuba is a “Failed State.” Such arguments, he said, have been used by Washington to destabilize and attack other revolutionary processes.

Diaz-Canel affirmed that Cubans will face any external threat and will fight to defend their sovereignty and independence.

“The socialist character of our revolution is not a phrase from the past; it is the shield of the present and the guarantee of the future. Cuba does not surrender. No one surrenders here. As the song goes, here, we will bring fire,” he said.

The Cuban president evoked the epic and unforgettable days of the Playa Giron battle and recalled the words of Commander Fidel Castro:

“Worker and peasant comrades, this is the socialist and democratic revolution of the humble, with the humble, and for the humble. And for this revolution of the humble, for the humble and for the humble, we are prepared to give our lives,” he said.

#Usa continues to attack Cuban medical brigades: teleSUR correspondent in #Cuba Belen de los Santos tells you why.#teleSUREnglish pic.twitter.com/ZNw8NZql3N

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) April 14, 2026

During the event in Havana, Diaz-Canel recalled another phrase spoken by Fidel just hours after the attempted U.S. invasion in 1961.

“What the imperialists cannot forgive us for is that we are here. What the imperialists cannot forgive us for is the dignity, the integrity, the courage, the ideological firmness, the spirit of sacrifice and the revolutionary spirit of the Cuban people,” the guerrilla leader said.

“That is what they cannot forgive us for. They cannot forgive us for being right under their noses — and for having made a socialist revolution right under the noses of the United States!” Fidel stressed.

Drawing a parallel between the threats of that time and those Washington generates now, Diaz-Canel highlighted the firmness and heroism of Cubans in defending their revolution.

“Cubans marched from here to combat and from combat to victory,” he said, emphasizing that the Playa Giron battle, “the first great defeat of imperialism in the Americas”, occurred after just 72 hours of fighting.

“The mercenaries were about to throw themselves against the nation that saw them born, convinced that nothing could stand against the protection the empire guaranteed them. But history would be merciless with them,” Diaz-Canel said, referring to Miami-based Cubans who supported the 1961 U.S. invasion.

“They expected fear and found courage. They bet on treason and were faced by a united people. They believed their lies, and the truth awaited them with rifles at the ready and singing the notes of the Bayamo anthem,” he added.

Fidel Castro on the beach at Playa Giron (Bay of Pigs), the site of the unsuccessful invasion by US-backed forces. Cuba, 1961. pic.twitter.com/cATxbL0XH8

— Historyland (@HistorylandHQ) July 17, 2025

During the mobilization in Havana, Cubans repudiated Washington’s economic war against Cuba, which has caused damages estimated at US$171 billion over six decades.

“As long as the U.S. blockade tightens the economy, no one can deny its absolute blame for the pain of Cuban families. The main cause of our problems is the genocidal blockade of the United States government against our people,” Diaz-Canel stressed.

“They have built a lying and very cynical narrative, presenting Cuba as a failed state, to hide the genocidal and multidimensional nature of the six-decade blockade, which suffocates all the people and can only be called an embargo on the papers of those who impose it.”

Using that malicious discourse, U.S. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio seek to justify a military intervention and present it as a “humanitarian operation.”

“Cuba is not a failed state. Cuba is a besieged state. Cuba is a state facing multidimensional aggression, an economic war, an intensified blockade, an energy blockade,” Diaz-Canel replied.

“Cuba is a threatened state that does not surrender. And despite everything, and thanks to socialism, Cuba is a state that resists, creates and will overcome. Do not doubt it!”

The Cuban president noted that the danger of an invasion exists even though his administration has shown a willingness to dialogue with the United States to resolve differences in the bilateral relationship.

Cuba Accuses US of Intimidating Fuel Trade Partners

He urged Cubans to be ready to take up arms and fight if U.S. military aggression were to occur.

“We do not want it, but it is our duty to prepare to avoid it and, if it is inevitable, to win it,” Diaz-Canel said, adding that “Fidel is that conviction that a united people can defeat an empire.”

The Cuban president affirmed that his country believes in dialogue and in the extraordinary power of peace.

For that reason, he invited the U.S. citizens to think “about everything that would affect the human lives of our two peoples if they were dragged into a senseless, illogical contest for which there are no pretexts or justifications, when there is so much we can do together.”

He also called for an international solidarity movement to carry Cuba’s truth and the suffering of its people as a result of the U.S. economic war, which has been aggravated by an oil blockade since January, to every corner of the planet.

El 15 de abril del año 1961
Bombardeo a los aeropuertos de San Antonio de los Baños y Ciudad Libertad, en La Habana y; el de Santiago de Cuba, como preludio de la invasión por Playa Girón. pic.twitter.com/z3u4yOOf6t

— Elia Oro (@oro_elia5297) April 15, 2026

The text reads, “On April 15, 1961, as a prelude to the Bay of Pigs invasion, the U.S. bombed the airports of San Antonio de los Baños and Ciudad Libertad in Havana, and the airport of Santiago de Cuba.” The image shows Fidel Castro atop a tank.

The proclamation of the socialist character of the Revolution took place on April 16, 1961, during the funeral honors for victims of bombings perpetrated the previous day by the United States against various points of the national territory, resulting in deaths and injuries. Those attacks were the prelude to the invasion of a mercenary brigade at the Bay of Pigs, which was armed and trained by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Before thousands of people who gathered near Colon Cemetery in Havana, Commander Fidel Castro Ruz called on workers, peasants and students to advance the “socialist and democratic revolution of the humble, with the humble and for the humble.”

In response, thousands of militiamen raised their rifles in the air and expressed their determination to defend the homeland. That date went down in national history as Day of the Militiaman. This occurred before the attempted U.S. invasion that began in the early morning of April 17 at the Bay of Pigs, south of Matanzas province.

On April 16, 1961, the July 26 Movement, the Revolutionary Directorate and the Popular Socialist Party — the three political-military organizations that fought the U.S.-backed dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista — took a first step toward their union.

On Oct. 3, 1965, those historic organizations formally constituted the Communist Party of Cuba and elected members of the Central Committee, among whom was Fidel Castro.

(teleSUR)


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

13
 
 

The president of Venezuela’s Monitoring Commission of the Amnesty Law for Democratic Coexistence, Deputy Jorge Arreaza, has reported that most of the applications received under this legal tool correspond to people who were in a judicial process, but not behind bars or detained.

“It’s not that we released 8,000 people from prison; that number of people detained for political reasons has never existed during the Bolivarian Revolution,” he explained this Wednesday, April 15. “The vast majority, 96.1%, were in legal proceedings and appeared regularly before the courts, and only 314 people were detained for political reasons, which is in accordance with the law.”

He stated that 8,406 applications have already received a ruling, which has allowed progress in reviewing cases that had previously remained open for years. “There were 8,000 people; the vast majority of them had been in process since 2004, 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2017. How do we address this? Through due process,” he explained, “which requires us to study the justice system, and this justifies the call for reform of the justice administration system made by our acting president, Delcy Rodríguez.”

National Assembly President: Institutionality, Dialogue, and the Economy Define the National Present

He highlighted the unprecedented level of coordination undertaken in implementing this law, given the overall volume of applications received. “As of yesterday, Tuesday, we had received 14,368 applications (11,772 valid applications),” he added, “numbers that force us to ask ourselves questions.”

Arreaza noted that all cases have been processed in accordance with the procedures established by the Commission, and that this law seeks to contribute to the country’s political stability and break the cycle of conspiracies and pardons.

(Últimas Noticias)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

14
 
 

Lehi, also known as the Stern Gang, wanted to partner with Nazi Germany to expel Britain from Mandatory Palestine and establish a Jewish State

Newly declassified Israeli files reveal pre-state Zionist militias contacted Nazi Germany officials for help in establishing a Jewish state in Palestine as World War II raged.

The newly released files are from the Israeli army’s archive, and were declassified at the request of Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

One file from May 1941 includes statements from Eliyahu Golomb, founder and de facto commander of the Haganah, a pre-state Zionist militia in Mandatory Palestine, which was under British control.

Golomb indicates that a rival Zionist militia was seeking to establish contacts with officials in Nazi Germany for help in expelling the British.

“I have information … about suspicion regarding a group of Jews who have connections with the enemy,” Golomb said, referring to the Germans.

“According to the information, there is a man who contacted the Germans. This man is known; his name is S,” he added.

“S” was Avraham “Yair” Stern, leader of Lehi, the pre-state underground Zionist militia also known as the Stern Gang.

Golomb’s remarks were recorded in real time in a Haganah intelligence document filed under “Contacts with the Axis.”

The declassified file includes material collected by the Haganah, and later by the Shin Bet (Israel’s internal security service) and the Israeli army, regarding the Stern Gang’s attempts to establish ties with the Axis powers, Italy and Germany.

Stern wanted help from Nazi Germany to expel the British and capture Palestine from its indigenous Muslim and Christian Palestinian inhabitants for the Jews.

His position differed from that of most of the Jewish community in Palestine, which had suspended its struggle against Britain to fight Germany in the broader European war.

“With the outbreak of World War II … there is no better time for a war of independence than during wartime. Britain’s forces are tied down … and it would be possible to overcome them,” Stern argued.

“The Jews are a party in the war and therefore cannot be neutral. Britain betrayed the Jewish people and will never allow the establishment of a Jewish state. On the other hand, Germany has no special interest in Palestine, and since the Nazis want to cleanse Europe of Jews, nothing is simpler than transferring them to their own state,” he added.

The document further states that Stern believed “it is possible to reach a practical agreement with the Germans … negotiations should be opened, and Jews of Europe should be recruited into a special army that would fight its way to Palestine and conquer it from the British. The Germans, he argued, would agree because it would rid them of the Jews while also removing the British from the Near East.”

According to Stern, some German officials supported strengthening Jewish settlement in Palestine by bringing Jews from Europe, believing they would be grateful and would later assist Germany.

What’s Really Behind Germany’s Unshakeable Support of Israel?

In the file tracking the Stern Gang’s contacts with the Axis powers, Stern is reported to have said: “We will manage somehow with the Germans after they conquer the land, just as the Soviets managed with them when necessary.”

Another document states that Stern wanted “to seize control of all of Eretz Yisrael [Palestine] by force with the help of a foreign power,” and that “it is clear he seriously considered becoming a ‘Jewish Quisling,’ with the aid of a foreign power.”

One document showed that the Stern Gang proposed an “active partnership” with Germany in the war, based on “shared interests between German policy and Jewish national aspirations.”

It also suggested that if a Jewish state were established in Palestine, it would form an alliance with Nazi Germany.

An internal Stern Gang pamphlet suggested that Britain had betrayed the Jews, making a partnership with Germany desirable.

“Britain is a traitor. Who decided the opposing side must necessarily be against the Jews? In any case, Jews must conduct independent politics and connect with whoever is worthwhile.”

“The Nazis are indeed against the Jews, but their hatred is directed at the Jews of the diaspora. There is no opposition in the Nazi program to a Judenstaat (a Jewish state),” the pamphlet added.

A document in the released file mentions that Naftali Lubenchik, a Stern Gang member sent to meet with German representatives, rejected the idea that Nazi Germany and its allies were seeking to exterminate European Jewry. Lubenchik believed “the Axis does not seek the physical destruction of the Jewish people, but rather their expulsion from Europe and their concentration in one place.”

It further states that he sought “to prove to Axis policymakers that it would be worthwhile to designate Eretz Yisrael as that place of concentration, thereby gaining the friendship of the Hebrew people, who would enlist for this purpose in the war against England.”

According to the files, another Stern Gang leader, Natan Friedman (Natan Yellin-Mor), who became a member of the Knesset, wrote in 1943: “Germany has not yet been defeated and may still become our ally.”

(The Cradle)


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

15
 
 

This article by Carolina Gómez Mena originally appeared in the April 16, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Women’s rights groups, including those defending reproductive rights and the rights of people of diverse sexual and gender identities, expressed their repudiation of the realization and financing with local public resources of the Fearless Masculinities Congress 2026, which will take place from April 17 to 19 at the Sanctuary of the Mexican Martyrs, in Tlaquepaque, Jalisco.

In a demonstration held outside the Ministry of the Interior, carried out in the context of the delivery of a letter of complaint to the Ministry’s official records office, members of Catholics for the Right to Decide, the Simone de Beauvoir Leadership Institute, Gendes, and REDefine Mexico, among others, condemned the use of public resources in spaces that promote anti-feminist positions and that represent a setback for the freedom and dignity of women and the LGBTI+ community.

During the protests, Jorge Esquivel, advocacy officer for the Simone de Beauvoir Leadership, denounced the existence of “irregularities in the allocation of this subsidy; it was requested by a civil association that no longer had registration as an authorized donee, but it ended up being granted to a different company name.”

“These types of changes in the allocation of public resources are not minor, as they may constitute administrative irregularities that must be clarified. We emphasize that there is an inconsistency in the legal framework used to receive this subsidy in Guadalajara, and therefore we request that a proper investigation be carried out. Likewise, we wish to denounce that this Congress promotes hate speech and gender stereotypes.”

In the document addressed to Rosa Icela Rodríguez, head of the Ministry of the Interior, the more than 30 signatory civil groups state that donations such as those made to that congress constitute a breach of various legal provisions, since “the premises occupied by religious associations are considered federal property, administered by the Institute of Administration and Appraisal of National Assets (INDAABIN).”

In this sense, “by granting subsidies (in cash and in kind) the municipality of Guadalajara shows a preference towards a religious denomination, thereby violating the separation between Churches and State and disregarding the neutral character of public space enshrined in the Political Constitution.”

Furthermore, they point out that the previous budget contains a “violation of the secularism of the Mexican Republic by allowing the participation of ministers of religion in political acts, among whom stand out the Archbishop of Guadalajara, Francisco Robles Ortega; Cardinal Kevin J. Farrell, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Laity, Family and Life of the Vatican; and priests from various congregations in our country.”

They also pointed out that the fact that the Sanctuary of the Martyrs “is used for political purposes constitutes a violation of various provisions of the Law of Religious Associations and Public Worship, its regulations, and the General Law of National Assets.”

Additionally, the Fearless Masculinity Congress, invoking concepts related to masculinity, promotes gender stereotypes and hate speech, which violate the principle of non-discrimination and equality before the law, protected by the secular nature of the State and the first and fourth constitutional articles.

“The conservative religious discourses disseminated by this congress and its convening organizations violate the freedoms and the exercise of rights of women and people of sexual and gender diversity.”

The organizations made it clear that the moral and religious discourses espoused by the congress “stigmatize and violate vulnerable populations; promote the breakdown of the civic pact between diverse beliefs and philosophical convictions; and set a dangerous precedent that attacks the foundations of liberal democracy.”

Therefore, there are “sufficient elements to initiate the appropriate investigations and for the Ministry of the Interior to take the pertinent measures related to the conduct carried out by the mayor of Guadalajara, Verónica Delgadillo; the head of the municipal cabinet and president of the Committee to grant subsidies, Bernardo Fernández; and the archbishop of Guadalajara, José Francisco Robles Ortega.”

The post Feminist & LGBTQ+ Groups Condemn Public Funding for Fearless Congress in Jalisco appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

16
 
 

Acting President Delcy Rodríguez’s message came after the Donald Trump administration lifted restrictions against the Banco Central de Venezuela (BCV).

Venezuela’s acting president, Delcy Rodríguez, called on the United States to put an end to its illegal sanctionson Venezuela and urged greater “maturity” from both countries in order to advance toward stable energy and economic cooperation.

“We insist to President Donald Trump that sanctions must cease so that investments can fully develop,” Acting President Rodríguez said during a working meeting with a delegation from the US Department of Energy led by US hydrocarbon and geothermal energy subsecretary Kyle Haustveit.

She stated that temporary licenses issued by Washington do not provide the legal certainty required for long-term investment: “A license does not offer legal security over time because it is subject to temporality.”

Partial easing of restrictionsRodríguez’s remarks followed the issuance of two licenses by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), including License 57, which lifts several restrictions imposed on the Banco Central de Venezuela (BCV) since 2019.

Another license authorizes “contingent” commercial negotiations with private actors, although still subject to multiple controls.

Rodríguez reiterated that such measures fall short of guaranteeing the stability needed by investors, echoing statements she made on March 24 during a meeting with national and international business representatives.

Call for long-term cooperationDuring the meeting, which was also attended by US Chargé D’affaires Laura Dogu, Rodríguez emphasized the need to move toward a long-term framework for cooperation.

“I believe both the United States and Venezuela have sufficient maturity to establish energy, economic, and cooperation relations within the framework of our respective laws,” she said.

She added that global energy market conditions are complex and that “a Venezuela without sanctions would undoubtedly have been able to achieve better cooperation.”

“Let us think about the future and how to build a long-term energy relationship,” she concluded, welcoming participation from independent energy companies.

Repeated calls to end sanctionsRodríguez has repeatedly urged Washington to lift sanctions imposed since 2015, arguing that their removal would provide institutional legal certainty and encourage sustained investment.

On April 1, she described a recent decision by the US government to remove her from its sanctions list as “a step in the direction of normalizing and strengthening relations,” expressing hope it would lead to the broader lifting of measures against Venezuela.

“Advancing toward a Venezuela without sanctions is essential,” Rodríguez said, framing the issue as key to building a stable, long-term economic future.

Venezuela Initiates Diplomatic Talks With Washington to Resume Bilateral Relations; SOUTHCOM’s Piracy Continues

(DiarioVEA) by Yuleidys Hernández Toledos

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

17
 
 

By Mnar Adley – Apr 9, 2026

Ahistoric synagogue in Tehran, originally built in 1958, was destroyed on the Jewish holiday of Passover by Israeli airstrikes on April 7th.

The Rafi-Nia Synagogue, located in central Tehran, was one of the longstanding institutions serving Iran’s Jewish community. Constructed in 1958, it stood as both a place of worship and a symbol of the deep historical roots of Judaism in Iran, which stretch back more than two millennia.

“We are Iranian Jews and we are always ready to sacrifice our lives for our homeland,” Bihdad Mikhail, managing director of the Tehran Jewish Association, told MintPress News as he held back his tears while carrying Jewish books that were destroyed by Israeli airstrikes.

The Mikhail told MintPress that the Jewish community in Iran is vehemently anti-Zionist and have vowed their loyalty to their Iranian homeland against Israeli attacks.

View this post on Instagram Raw video footage and interviews with the synagogue director however show that the building was completely leveled, with religious materials, including Torah scrolls, buried beneath the rubble. Israel denies deliberately targeting the historic synagogue, with Israeli officials describing the damage as “collateral”.

The strike has been condemned not only by Iranian officials but also by members of Iran’s Jewish community who told MintPress that “Israel is an ominous Zionist regime”.

Representatives of the community have emphasized that the synagogue was a purely religious space, with no military function, underscoring the broader implications of the attack.

The destruction of the Rafi-Nia Synagogue highlights the often-overlooked reality of Iran’s Jewish population. Contrary to common perceptions, Iran is home to one of the largest Jewish communities in the Middle East outside of Israel, with more than 10,000 Jews and approximately 100 active synagogues across the country. These communities have maintained religious life and cultural traditions for generations.

Yes, All Jews

Judaism is one of the main recognized religions by the Iranian government providing religious protection to this community.

For many, the attack raises troubling questions about the widening scope of the conflict.

Religious and cultural sites have historically been protected under international law, yet recent weeks have seen increasing reports of damage to UNESCO heritage sites across Iran, either directly or through nearby strikes.

The timing of the strike has also intensified outrage. Reports indicate that the attack occurred during a period of religious observance, amplifying concerns that places of worship are no longer being treated as protected spaces in the expanding war.

Beyond the immediate destruction, the loss of the synagogue represents a deeper cultural blow. Sites like the Rafi-Nia Synagogue are not only places of worship but also repositories of history, identity, and communal memory. Their destruction erases physical links to longstanding minority communities that have coexisted within Iran for centuries.

While Israel claims to be a “Jewish State”, this latest attack against an Iranian synagogue shows Israel’s actions are rooted in destruction, genocide and an attempt to sow chaos.

(MintPress News)


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

18
 
 

This article by Álvaro Delgado Gómez originally appeared in the April 16, 2026 edition of Sin Embargo. The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project*.*

The Catholic order Legionaries of Christ and the Regnum Christi lay movement, founded by the pedophile priest Marcial Maciel Degollado, propose to recover “masculine identity” and create “virtuous men” at the congress to be held between April 17 and 19 at the Sanctuary of the Martyrs in Tlaquepaque, Jalisco, exactly one hundred years after the beginning of the Cristero War in Mexico. Under the protection of the Church hierarchy and governments of the Movimiento Ciudadano (MC) party, the congress will bring together more than 10,000 members of the conservative elites of Latin America.

The Fearless Congress— “masculinity without fear”—features actors Eduardo Verástegui and Jonathan Roumie, as well as former soccer players Carles Puyol and Ricardo Izecson “Kaká,” as its main speakers, and is organized by disciples of Marcial Maciel, condemned by the Vatican itself as a criminal of sexual crimes: The executive director is Andrés Villaseñor Urrea, a prominent member of Regnum Christi, and the spiritual director is Ignacio Bello, a priest of the Legionaries of Christ, who is in charge of at least a dozen priests from that controversial order who are participating in the event.

All the institutions convening this congress are linked to the Legionaries of Christ—whose founder sexually abused at least 60 minors and 32 other priests of the congregation did so with at least another 175—among them the Anáhuac university network, Regnum Christi, founded by Maciel Degollado to bring together lay people with priests, and the Family Network, which brings together ultraconservative associations, whose official website complains in English about restrictions on freedom of expression, such as Sabina Berman’s interview with Verástegui that was not broadcast in public media.

“The largest masculinity congress in Latin America,” as it is promoted and whose tickets cost up to 7,490 pesos, has as its “spiritual guides” the Archbishop of Guadalajara, Francisco Robles Ortega, and the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Laity, Family and Life and Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church in the Vatican, Kevin Farrell, but it is also supported by political power: The Government of Jalisco, headed by Pablo Lemus, as well as the city councils of Guadalajara and Zapopan, all from the Movimiento Ciudadano political party, appeared from the beginning as sponsors, alongside businessmen such as Carlos Álvarez Bermejillo, owner of the pharmaceutical company Grupo Pisa.

Following criticism on social media, the logos of the three government entities were removed. Photo: Screenshot

Only when journalist Jonathan Lomelí proved that the Mayor of Guadalajara, Verónica Delgadillo, donated 400,000 pesos to Villaseñor Urrea —180,000 to pay for the speakers’ fees, lodging and travel expenses; 120,000 pesos for infrastructure and equipment for the venue; 60,000 pesos for an advertising campaign; and 40,000 pesos for security— did the official emblems of the authorities disappear from the event’s official website.

It is not uncommon in Jalisco for politicians to use public money to court the Church and its ministers: The venue where the congress will be held, the Sanctuary of the Martyrs, began construction in Tlaquepaque in 2007, with resources from the state treasury: The PAN governor Emilio González Márquez, a sworn member of the secret organization El Yunque, announced in March of that year a donation of 90 million pesos to begin construction of the project, which he defined as an investment.

In front of the then archbishop Juan Sandoval Íñiguez, the driving force behind the project, the PAN member González Márquez stated: “Without ignoring that this project has spiritual objectives for those who promote it, the state government sees the possibility of a great economic boost in the capital of our state.”

Former governor Emilio González is a sworn member of the secret organization El Yunque. Photo: Cuartoscuro

The PAN governor was harshly criticized by sectors in Jalisco, and more than 5,000 complaints were filed with the State Human Rights Commission (CEDH). He dismissed the complaints, saying, “I don’t give a damn,” and then, in a drunken state and in front of Cardinal Sandoval Íñiguez, he insulted his critics: “Say what you want. Excuse me, Cardinal: go fuck yourselves!”

Nineteen years after that episode, which is commemorated this April 24, the Sanctuary of the Martyrs houses the 25 combatants of the Cristero War 1926-1929 who have been declared saints and blessed, and will now be the setting for the disciples of the pedophile Marcial Maciel to meet to recover masculinity.

“We are living through a silent crisis: men confused, empty, and disconnected from their purpose. Masculine identity has weakened, leaving profound questions: Am I enough? Do I have what it takes?” he states as the reason for the congress.

Mayor Verónica Delgadillo and Governor Pablo Lemus. Photo: Instagram @verodelgadillog

“But this crisis doesn’t have the last word. There is still hope. Fearless was born as a call to reclaim your true identity, rise up with courage, and live with purpose,” he states.

Thus, with the full support of the organizations founded by the pedophile Marcial Maciel, the organizers explain how this movement, which now has a congress, emerged: “Starting from the attack on masculinity and the need for virtuous men… with our personal needs, life stories and wounds, we sought a path of healing that we share with our friends by doing retreats, workshops, bootcamps and now… a congress!”

The post Movimiento Ciudadano Funds Masculinity Congress Organized by Disciples of Pedophile Priest appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

19
 
 

A temporary ceasefire in Lebanon is expected to be announced wednesday following Iranian pressure, yet concerns over Netanyahu potentially disrupting the agreement remain.

A ceasefire in Lebanon is expected to be approved starting wednesday, following Iranian follow-ups and pressure efforts, a senior Iranian political-security source told Al Mayadeen.

With much follow-up and pressure from Iran, a ceasefire in Lebanon will be approved as of wednesday,” the source told Al Mayadeen, adding that “the duration of the ceasefire will be one week, extending until the end of the ceasefire period between Iran and the United States.”

Commenting on possible challenges to the agreement, the source said there remains a risk of disruption by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. They stated, “It is possible that Netanyahu, being the disruptive element he is, will try to sabotage this agreement.”

“However, we are dealing with Washington as the sponsor and partner of the occupation and the party responsible for restraining him,” the senior source asserted.

Lebanese officials informed of ceasefire efforts
Ibrahim al-Moussawi, a member of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc in the Lebanese parliament, told Reutersthat diplomatic efforts by Iran and other regional countries could produce a ceasefire in Lebanon “soon”, adding that Tehran had used its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz as leverage.

“The Iranians are exercising high pressure against the Americans and they have put their conditions that the Americans should include Lebanon in the ceasefire. If they don’t do it, they are going to continue their blockade of Hormuz. It’s the economic card,” al-Moussawi said.

“The Iranians have opened up to several regional and international parties to achieve this goal,” he said.
Moreover, two senior Lebanese officials told Reutersthat Lebanon has been briefed on the ongoing efforts to reach a ceasefire in Lebanon, with the duration of the ceasefire in Lebanon being likely linked to the US–Iran truce.

Commenting on the developments, Al Mayadeen’s Beirut Bureau director stated, “The Resistance has, through its accomplishments on the ground, managed to impose elements of strength in the negotiation process.”

Israeli cabinet meeting
Meanwhile, Israeli media reported that the entity’s Security and Political Cabinet is expected to meet this evening at 8 pm to discuss and vote on a US-backed ceasefire proposal for Lebanon.

The reports added that, if the proposal is approved, the ceasefire could take effect as early as the following morning.

Commenting on the issues, Israeli Channel 13 reported that the United States has effectively accepted Iran’s condition linking renewed negotiations to a ceasefire in Lebanon.

According to the channel, the decision to move forward with a ceasefire was made in Washington and then transmitted to “Israel”, where it is expected to receive formal approval and ratification by the cabinet.

On April 11 Coup Anniversary, Delcy Rodríguez Condemns Fascism, Venezuela Expresses Solidarity with Lebanon Following Israeli Aggression

Iran ties its ceasefire to ceasefire in Lebanon
Iran has tied its ceasefire with the US to a ceasefire in Lebanon since the very beginning of the negotiations in Islamabad on April 11.

According to the report, Washington has agreed to Iranian preconditions that include the establishment of a tangible ceasefire across West Asia, with Lebanon specifically referenced as part of the broader regional truce being discussed.

Tehran has emphasized that any final deal must ensure the ceasefire is fully enforced throughout Lebanon, particularly in the south, where it says continued Israeli strikes on civilian infrastructure violate the spirit of the negotiations.

Trump shifted position on Lebanon ceasefire after call with Netanyahu
However, US President Donald Trump reportedly shifted Washington’s position on whether the proposed ceasefire with Iran included Lebanon following a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, diplomatic sources told CBS News, adding to growing confusion over the scope of the agreement.In detail, the United States and Iran had initially agreed to a two-week ceasefire on April 7 following mediation involving Pakistani officials, with early understandings, communicated by regional mediators in Islamabad, suggesting the deal applied across the region, including Lebanon.On April 8, Islamabad publicly announced that the ceasefire agreement between Washington and Tehran would apply “everywhere”, including Lebanon, and invited US and Iranian delegations to further negotiations scheduled for April 10 in Pakistan. Pakistan also warned on the same day that continued hostilities, including Israeli strikes on Lebanon, risked undermining the ceasefire and the wider peace process between the United States and Iran.Sources said that before the Trump–Netanyahu call, US officials had indicated acceptance of a broader framework that encompassed Lebanon, as well as “Israel”. However, after the call, Washington’s position reportedly shifted, with US officials walking back that interpretation.The change has raised questions among diplomatic observers over the consistency of US commitments in the negotiations, as regional efforts continue to manage the fallout from ongoing tensions

(Al Mayadeen)


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

20
 
 

This article by Eduardo Mendoza was originally published in the April 16, 2026 edition of sdpnoticias.

Members of the Morena and Workers Party (PT) caucuses in the Chamber of Deputies publicly announced that they are against fracking in Mexico.

In a press conference, they announced that they will present a constitutional reform project, through which they seek to completely prohibit fracking in Mexico. This is despite President Sheinbaum having stated that she will analyze , through a team of experts, the feasibility of implementing fracking in our country.

Lawmakers from Morena and PT announced that they will promote a reform project, through which they seek to modify article 27 and thus prohibit fracking in Mexico with constitutional status.

Deputies Adrián González Naveda and Olga Juliana Elizondo , from the PT, and Xóchitl Zagal and Manuel Vázquez , from Morena, reiterated that the prohibition of fracking is a commitment to the people of Mexico since the so-called Plan C.

In a press conference, they stated that their intention is to reintroduce this reform into the debate, as they claimed it was the only one presented by former President AMLO in Plan C that was not approved.

González Naveda pointed out that presenting this reform is the product of a social struggle in the territory, since many towns have expressed their opposition to implementing fracking.

He announced that a nationwide public consultation is planned to gauge public opinion on this controversial method of obtaining gas.

Finally, he stated that the people of Mexico will be against implementing fracking, since he pointed out that there is a risk of water, land, and social problems in several municipalities of the country.

For this reason, Indigenous communities have also spoken out against it, stating that they will not give in to the pressures that this controversial form of gas extraction could cause.

The post Morena & Workers Party Deputies Oppose Fracking in Mexico appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

21
 
 

This editorial by Ariana Escalante Kantún originally appeared in the April 14, 2026 edition of Sin Embargo. The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project*.*

On April 8th, President Claudia Sheinbaum presented a report titled “Natural Gas: A Strategy to Strengthen Energy Sovereignty” during a daily press conference. The first slide stated that fossil gas, often incorrectly called natural gas, is a gaseous fuel used in industrial processes requiring heat, as well as in electricity generation and domestic use. She added that it is a less polluting fuel than coal, fuel oil, and other petroleum products. Interestingly, what she omitted was that methane is the main component of “natural gas,” and despite having up to 30 times the global warming potential of CO2, its use in the global energy mix has increased by 67 percent in the last two decades.

We agree with the diagnosis that Mexico has a high dependence on natural gas since it imports more than 70 percent from the United States, which has implications that the presentation indicates: sensitivity to international variations, vulnerability to climatic events, vulnerability to international conflicts, limitations in regional development, uncertainty in the guarantee of supply and dependence on foreign decisions.

To avoid all of the above, the administration proposes increasing fossil gas production through fracking. Paradoxically, gas production in Mexico has been declining for 17 years. Production is currently at 3.6 billion cubic feet per day (MMcf/d), 35 percent less than the peak in 2009. This is also evident in the information presented at the morning press conference, where a graph projects that by 2030 production will reach 2.192 billion cubic feet per day, and that the country as a whole will produce 5.871 billion cubic feet per day. However, Mexico currently demands 9 billion cubic feet per day, and this figure does not include the 30 percent increase in demand projected by the Ministry of Energy itself. In other words, even with increased fossil gas production, we would not be able to meet half of our energy consumption.

Mexico currently demands 9 billion cubic feet [of gas] per day, and this figure does not include the 30 percent increase in demand projected by the Ministry of Energy itself: even with increased fossil gas production, we would not be able to meet half of our energy consumption.

What venturing into the highly polluting technology of fracking would cause is serious environmental damage. It is a hydrocarbon extraction technique that involves injecting large volumes of fluids under pressure to fracture rocks containing trapped gas and oil. In this technique, a single well can consume between 9,000 and 29,000 cubic meters of water, equivalent to between 2.4 and 7.7 Olympic-sized swimming pools. In a typical field where six wells are drilled to extract all the gas from the reservoir, between 54,000 and 174,000 cubic meters of water would be used. This poses a significant risk, as several regions of the country are experiencing water stress. Furthermore, liquefaction plants and the transport of gas by LNG carriers involve significant methane emissions, risks of spills, disruption of local productive activities, and irreversible transformation of marine ecosystems due to increased maritime traffic.

Despite claims that fracking is more environmentally friendly, this is false. After two decades of fracking in the United States, there is extensive scientific literature documenting the environmental and social impacts of this technique in the regions where it has been practiced, including air, groundwater, and surface water pollution from leaks or spills of fracturing fluids.

Techniques like fracking are part of the idea that technology can solve everything, reflecting a blind faith in science that assumes that by producing major technological advancements we can solve any problem, such as the depletion of gas and oil reserves. However, this is inherently contradictory, as it ignores and defies fundamental laws of physics, such as thermodynamics, which establish limits on the energy and work that can be performed in a given system. In other words, it acknowledges the impossibility of infinite growth on a finite planet with limits that restrict our growth and the use of energy and common resources.

The use of fracking in Mexico will not guarantee energy sovereignty and will not lead to a just energy transition. Dependence on fossil fuels also presents significant challenges, especially during times of high geopolitical tension, where we have seen that rising prices compromise, for example, food security.

Mexico is missing a crucial opportunity to lead regional change to reverse its fossil fuel dependency, combat energy poverty inequalities, and guarantee socio-environmental justice for all its people and their territories. Mexico must develop a clear roadmap, tailored to the country’s specific challenges, for the orderly phase-out of fossil fuels. This roadmap should include sectoral diversification of energy sources, an analysis of high consumption patterns, and prioritizing the most stable energy sources for hospitals, schools, health centers, and other essential services. Fossil fuel dependency is causing more problems than it solves and seriously jeopardizes our right to a healthy environment. Therefore, we reaffirm our opposition to fracking—not here, not there, not today, not ever.

The post No to Fracking appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

22
 
 

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the US Treasury Department has eased sanctions on the Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV). This was published on the agency’s website under General License No. 57, seven years after the US empire imposed sanctions on Venezuela’s main financial institution.

The measure, enacted this Tuesday, April 14, also includes the following public financial entities: Banco de Venezuela, Banco Digital de los Trabajadores, and Banco del Tesoro.

The action comes 24 hours after Acting President Delcy Rodríguez once again urged the US to lift the illegal sanctions imposed against Venezuela since March 2015. Her appeal was made during the signing of an agreement between Petróleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA) and Chevron, an event attended by the US chargé d’affaires in Venezuela, Laura Dogu, and the US under-secretary of hydrocarbons and geothermal energy, Kyle Haustveit.

“I always take the opportunity to insist that we must move towards a Venezuela without sanctions,” Rodríguez said on Monday, April 13, in the Sol del Perú Room of the Miraflores Palace, Caracas. “I always tell this to the [US] ambassador, to the [US] government, because it is also a way to provide institutional legal security to investors who come to Venezuela.”

The BCV was sanctioned in April 2019, during President Trump’s first term ruling the US entity.

What does License 57 say?
The document issued by the US agency on Tuesday, April 14, states: “All transactions prohibited by the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR Part 591 (VSR), that are inherent and necessary for the provision, export or re-export, directly or indirectly, of financial services to, from or for the benefit of the following persons are authorized: (1) Central Bank of Venezuela; (2) Banco de Venezuela, SA Banco Universal (Banco de Venezuela); (3) Banco Digital de los Trabajadores Banco Universal CA; (4) Banco del Tesoro, CA Banco Universal (Banco del Tesoro)…”

The text describes that for the purposes of this general license, the term “financial services” includes “the maintenance, operation or closure of accounts; loans; transfers; fund transfers; banking services; money transfer services; collections; presentations; promissory notes; orders; consignments; the acceptance of deposits; insurance; guarantees; cash withdrawals; check services; transfers through the Automated Clearing House (ACH); electronic transfers; debit cards, prepaid cards, ATM transactions and any other payment as defined in Section 3-602 of the Uniform Commercial Code; the issuance and use of payment cards and digital wallets; foreign exchange; banking, payment and correspondent account services denominated in US dollars.”

It also includes “services related to the collection, sending, processing or receipt of funds or remittances; services related to the processing or receipt of salaries, pensions, annuities, payroll and other employment payments or benefits; fund transfers sent by means of mobile money, mobile wallets, digital bank accounts, credit cards, debit cards, online payments or other digital technologies; services and technologies related to security, fraud prevention, verification, authentication, cybersecurity and protection; investments; securities; and futures or options on commodities.”

The removal of the illegal sanctions that the US applied against the BCV for seven years, as well as the sanctioning measures it maintained against the Banco de Venezuela, Banco Digital de los Trabajadores, and Banco del Tesoro, does not mean the lifting of the more than one thousand sanctions that the Yankee regime has imposed against Venezuela since 2015.

In fact, on February 18, 2026, the US empire extended the March 8, 2015, sanctions—passed by then-President Barack Obama—for another year in Executive Order 13692, which declares Venezuela as an alleged “unusual and extraordinary threat.”

Since 2015, both Obama and the presidents who succeeded him—namely Donald Trump in his first term (2017-2021) and in his second (2025-), as well as Joe Biden (2021-2025)—have imposed more than a thousand illegal colonial sanctions on Venezuela.

Contingent contracts
The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) also issued License 56 on April 14, which “authorizes” “Conditional Contract Trade Negotiations with the Government of Venezuela.”

“This general license authorizes all transactions prohibited by Executive Order (EO) 13884 that are inherent and necessary to enter into commercial negotiations of contingent contracts with the government of Venezuela,” the text reads, “provided that the execution of such contracts is expressly conditioned upon a separate authorization from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (‘contingent contracts’).”

Order 13884, issued on August 5, 2019, among other things, blocks the assets of the Venezuelan government, defined similarly to the term in Executive Order 13857. Order 13884 expanded the program of unilateral measures to include an “embargo” and authorized the application of secondary sanctions. Order 13857, issued on January 25, 2019, established the blocking and freezing of PDVSA (CITGO) assets in the US.

For the purposes of the aforementioned general license, License 56 explains that “contingent contracts includes contracts pending execution, pro forma invoices pending execution, agreements in principle, offers pending execution that are subject to acceptance, such as tenders or proposals in response to public competitions, binding memoranda of understanding or any other similar agreement.”

Venezuela’s Diosdado Cabello: Some Beneficiaries of Amnesty Seek to Incite Violence

Anti-blockade deputy minister’s take
The Venezuelan Anti-Blockade deputy minister, William Castillo, explained on Wednesday in an interview that the license allows companies from the US empire or related to it to establish negotiations with public financial entities in Venezuela.

According to his statements, the document authorizes transactions with the Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV), as well as the Banco de Venezuela (BDV), the Banco Digital de los Trabajadores (BDT), and the Banco del Tesoro (BT).

“It is very important because it authorizes US or related companies to have financial negotiations with the Central Bank of Venezuela and with the three banks that form the heart of public banking in Venezuela,” he explained. “They can open accounts, they can make transfers, and by allowing them this operation, it opens a window for these banks to precisely be able to have operations in the international financial system.”

(Diario Vea) by Yuleidys Hernández Toledo with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

23
 
 

This article by Cristóbal Morales originally appeared in the April 16, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

President Claudia Sheinbaum announced that Citlali Hernández resigned as head of the Women’s Secretariat to join the Morena party for a special task in preparation for the 2027 elections.

“Yesterday, Citlali submitted her resignation to me from the Women’s Secretariat. She told me she’s going to the party, that she wants to go and help Morena,” the President declared during her morning press conference at the National Palace.

Claudia Sheinbaum commented that Citlali Hernández’s departure was in response to a request from the Morena leadership to provide support in the area of ​​alliances for the upcoming electoral processes.

“I understand that Luisa María Alcalde asked her if she could help with this issue or assist the executive committee. And so I believe she will be given a special appointment to carry out these tasks,” the president stated.

Sheinbaum explained that the decision came after a conversation between the official and a member of her own party.

She also acknowledged that the resignation took her by surprise and announced that Hernández will leave his post starting tomorrow.

The President added that she will announce the name of the woman who will head the agency in the coming days.

During Hernández’s tenure as head of the Women’s Secretariat, constitutional reforms such as the one establishing substantive equality between women and men were promoted. One pending issue is the reform to standardize the crime of femicide in all the country’s penal codes.

The post Citlalli Hernández Resigns from Women’s Secretariat to Join Morena, President Sheinbaum Announces appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

24
 
 

This article by Arturo Rivero originally appeared on April 15, 2026 at Lafuentelaboral.

The UMA/Unidad de Medida y Actualización is an economic reference in pesos used by the Mexican government to determine the amount of payments for obligations, fines and the like. As of 2026, the daily UMA value is MXN117.31 or $6.79USD.

In the midst of a wave of industrial closures on the northern border, seeking to force makeup, manufacturing and export companies to notify at least 90 days in advance of any closure, relocation or permanent suspension of operations, reveals an initiative being discussed in the Chamber of Deputies.

Failure to comply, an unjustified collective dismissal will be presumed, with fines of up to 70 thousand UMAs ($475,636.61USD)

The proposal aims to reform the Federal Labour Act and stop the exit of companies that leave thousands of workers without employment or compensation.

“The creation of a mandatory compensation fund is being proposed, which should be established in collective contracts and guarantee the payment of benefits in the face of unexpected closures, shielding workers from bankruptcy or abrupt exits,” the document says.

The initiative arises after a growing labor crisis, evidenced by cases such as the collapse of First Brands Group in Ciudad Juarez, where hundreds of employees were left without settlement.

In parallel, more than 17 makeup artists have recently closed, impacting nearly 9,000 workers, while the city accumulates 65,000 job loss since 2023.

In addition, the reform contemplates criminal penalties in cases of fraud, simulation or transfer of assets to avoid labor responsibilities, giving intervention to the Public Ministry.

The post Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies Discussing Plant Closure Legislation appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

25
 
 

*The interview granted by the president of Venezuela’s National Assembly, Jorge Rodríguez, to the Spanish newspaper El País offers a detailed account of the position of the Venezuelan political leadership at a moment of reconfiguration. The leader emphasizes the cohesion of Chavismo, the defense of institutional order, and the need to move toward a new political cycle centered on stability and economic development.*Within this framework, his statements outline a consistent narrative about Venezuela’s present and immediate future.

Political cohesion and defense of sovereigntyOne of the central elements of the interview is the dismantling of recurring claims that attempt to show that fractures have appeared within the Chavista forces in Venezuela. In response to such assertions, Jorge Rodríguez stated: “That is completely false. Chavismo is more united than ever.” This affirmation is placed within a recurring discursive pattern that, according to him, has appeared at different moments under different names but with the same objective: to suggest divisions that do not exist.

The deputy describes this recurrence as part of an external narrative seeking to reinterpret the internal dynamics of Venezuelan political power: “They keep talking … before, they said Maduro and Diosdado, now [they say] Rodríguez.” He suggests that claims of internal tensions respond more to interpretative needs than to verifiable facts within the actual functioning of the Chavista leadership.

The president of the National Assembly emphasized the existence of effective and permanent mechanisms of political coordination. Referring to moments of high sensitivity, he noted that communication among top leadership figures is continuous. For example, he recounts that up until the night of January 2, both he and the acting president Delcy Rodríguez were in direct contact with President Nicolás Maduro, while other leaders also maintained constant communication.

Rodríguez situated this cohesion within a broader political framework linked to the defense of national stability. In this regard, he affirmed the existence of a strategic agreement among the key actors of the Bolivarian process: “We all agree … on the need to protect and defend peace along with Venezuela’s sovereignty and independence.” This formulation establishes a hierarchy in political action, prioritizing the preservation of internal order in the face of destabilizing factors.

From there, he introduced a reflective dimension regarding lessons learned from periods of heightened political conflict, highlighting the need to transform how political adversaries are perceived: “The first thing I think we learned is the need not to see the other as an enemy.” This marks a significant shift in political discourse, suggesting that stability also depends on managing differences within a framework of mutual recognition.

This reflection is complemented by a critique of political dynamics that have historically hindered durable agreements. Rodríguez summarizes it in a phrase that reflects his experience in negotiation processes: “Chavistas are bad losers, but the opposition are terrible winners.” The expression points to a structural issue in Venezuelan politics: the difficulty of building guarantees and recognizing outcomes that enable democratic coexistence.

Economy, dialogue, and the projection of political stabilityRodríguez identifies the economic sphere is the central challenge and, at the same time, the foundation of Venezuela’s current political stage. “The most important thing right now is the economy,” he says, linking it to the need for the political process to have a tangible impact on people’s daily lives. He stressed that the goal is to move toward economic dynamism that allows “the population to feel… that this entire process was worth it.”

This emphasis implies a strategic reorientation that combines political continuity with adjustments in economic management. Rodríguez acknowledges that one of the key lessons learned has been the need to create more competitive conditions for investment, particularly in strategic sectors such as energy. “No one is going to invest their money if they don’t have sufficient guarantees,” he stated, while explaining that the country has been adapting its legal and economic frameworks to facilitate such processes.

He framed this as a sovereign decision aimed at strengthening national productive capacity. In this regard, he noted that Venezuela had fallen behind in attracting investment compared to other oil- and gas-producing countries, making it necessary to correct that gap. This acknowledgment does not imply a break with the political model but rather an adaptation to global conditions while maintaining control over strategic resources.

Alongside the economic axis, Rodríguez highlights political dialogue as essential for the country’s stabilization. “We are in a process of deep dialogue with all sectors of the opposition… within the bounds of the Constitution,” he explains, drawing a line between those participating in this process and those who have opted for confrontation. Openness to dialogue, he insists, is conditioned on respect for institutional frameworks.

At this point, he also introduced the possibility of broad agreements regarding electoral processes, without closing off debate on their specific configuration: “Who knows if we reach an agreement to begin with National Assembly elections and then presidential ones … or hold them all together,” he remarked, indicating a degree of flexibility in building political consensus.

However, he insisted that a fundamental requirement for progress is trust in the electoral system: “There is another thing that must be done as well, and that is for everyone to be able to trust the authority that organizes those elections.”

Rodríguez also identified structural obstacles that have hindered agreements in the past, including the lack of mutual recognition among political actors and the absence of guarantees following agreements. This self-criticism is paired with a call to establish stronger conditions for political coexistence, including clear mechanisms to ensure compliance with commitments.

Another relevant point is his reference to an amnesty policy as part of a broader normalization process. He explained that multiple situations of political conflict have been evaluated, with the exception of those linked to extreme calls for violence such as invasions or coups. Within this framework, he proposed advancing toward a political culture based on respect for differences and the overcoming of “maximalisms” that, according to him, generate exclusion and confrontation.

On the international front, he projected a pragmatic openness, particularly in economic relations. He highlighted the continued presence of European energy companies in Venezuela even during the most difficult periods, as well as the willingness of private actors to adapt to new conditions. “Private companies are adjusting more quickly to these changes than European governments,” he noted, underscoring the practical recognition of opportunities within the Venezuelan market.

Rodríguez’s position framed the current moment as a phase of strategic reordering of the Venezuelan state and national politics, where political stability—achieved after years of conflict—serves as a platform for economic reactivation and the expansion of consensus.

The emphasis on clear rules for investment, dialogue within constitutional frameworks, and the overcoming of extreme confrontation dynamics reflects the view that the country has withstood internal and external pressures and is now in a position to redefine its trajectory based on its own capacities.

Jorge Rodríguez: Venezuela Exercises Full Control Over Its Sovereignty

(Misión Verdad)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

view more: next ›