zerakith

joined 2 years ago
[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

cries in climate crisis

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Take the point about causality direction but it is about the broader impact of the fact that the policy of the last decades towards the railway has been somewhere between managed decline and life support. An industrial strategy that recognised rail for its primary role in decarbonisation and the future of transport (rather than false horizons and gadgets) would have reduced the cost of maintainance and storage as well as eased the capacity issues that make it logistically and economically hard for its use (which I believe has also been an issue).

Can't comment on support for monarchy and ERII death. I imagine that most people fail to see it as an issue that materially affects them with the governance issues being largely hidden from view.

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

To be replaced by helicopters. I despair

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I was thinking more booting to a few from a usb and playing around.

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I think the usual consensus is Linux Mint (and its a solid distro) but I think the best advice is not to be afraid of trying different ones and finding out what works best for you.

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

This one comes to mind https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/new-city-centre-cycle-scheme-24598715

Been a while since I looked but my understanding is that 1.5m max widths excludes best practice to allow cargo bikes and accessible bikes movement.

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not saying we shouldn't consider this in urban design but I've seen a number of cycling schemes be ruined because of the advice that no gap greater than 1.5m can be left to prevent this sort of attack.

I can't help but feel we shouldn't be accept living in a fortress in order to avoid universal access to machines that can cause such damage.

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree and its strange its not been mentioned at all. It seems odd to me given how much capacity there is unused in the tunnel itself that the warehousing wasn't built to an equivalent spec. Its possible it was planned for depots to be on the onward HS routes that never happened (i.e. HS2 via the HS1-HS2 link).

It would be a small amount of money when compared to road building budgets but car brain dominates DfT (and Treasury) thinking.

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Eurostar suddenly decides it does plan to expand after ruling outlining if they don't they will have to provide space in the depot for a rival.

They say in the 2030s - that could 14 years away compared with the rival consortium who said by 2029

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Personally, I'm planning additional physical storage of photos off site. Not yet configured but planning for a subset of photos deemed too important to lose to be automatically printed and stored on physical media (DVDs).

In general I'm hoping it to promote a more careful approach to what media really is important to keep.

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Oh then I was being dense. I actually use kg because I'm of a generation that was only taught that and have no internal conception of stones :(

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (10 children)

British people are annoying more likely to reply in imperial units to this question.

view more: ‹ prev next ›