why0y

I have internal RAID1s that store at least two directories apart from any OS or home dev.

../repos ../misc

Misc contain timestamp fstabs, mdadm.conf, rust/python/apt user-inatalled package names, among other notes and small files.

I also sync my master org directory between my documents snapshots and the repos dir

FLOSS is dumb because it's too good for us. I haven't paid for software in ten years. And I could use this great stuff to build bad stuff.

That's why I refuse to use Linux. It enables a front end of tech stacks for morons to profit from, and sell ideas like state surveillance, AI worker displacement, and other boogey monster tech to audiences gooning for tech to profit from, instead of honoring the purity of open source and what it enables creative young folk to do with it.

FLOSS didn't radicalize me to create, it radicalized me about worker rights.

Headline 1: mangocats supports local drug dealers by providing free-to-use property under the guise of free pecans to hide young adults that indulge in drug use, promiscuity, and other acts on mangocats pecan orchard.

That's the most obvious and potentially PC way that predators can overreach on someone's generosity and turn a "awwe" thing (the free pecans) into people getting in trouble or hurt.

The worst is some legal jujitsu of your signage "free pecans" implying tacit and potentially unrestricted use and/or terms of use to the orchard. Now some asshole subsumes your free pecans into the bottom line of their criminal enterprise, and you're the longest running connection providing a financial bedrock for their blah blah. Now you're in Rico. Pecans to uncle without even hitting the blunt.

I don't speak from experience. But I was a young adult, I do by the book things, and I also developed an imagination of what can and could happen.

Then I tried magic cigarettes and got paranoid and now all I do is cross my Ts because therenare real good people to become better from. And there's the other kind too and they love slipping people up.

"Free nuts"

If it's radioactive, that's because of a fundamental assumptive imbalance in the contract between the author, the community, the users, the stakeholders, and the parasitic lawyers and their overlords.

If they don't like it, pay/license and/or contribute.

AFAIK xfce desktop environment on top of Ubuntu (xubuntu), or any Linux distribution, is considered the best resource utilization option for old hardware.

Will checkout your repos. Thanks for comment. It's been a breeze to write python and the docstrings are pretty great. I've had periods where everything just worked for Sphinx autodoc and then others where it's just broken for months. Thanks again

Would seriously love someone to rip down Sphinxdoc and put this baby to bed.

In my history of using docstrings, I've put maybe 20-40minutes of docs into a 200k+ codebase. It's super easy.

In my history of using Sphinx autodoc, I've spent about 5-10 hours fumbling with Makefiles, configs, and other nightmares and it still has the worst developer experience after about 8 years of using it.

Did you answer your own comment?

Linux Distribution "NixOS" drama: Moderation Team resigns in protest over Interference of Leadership; Elected Leader works for US Military Company, fearing alignment with US fascistic development

Downloading, I believe, is an extremely difficult thing for most people.

What a stupid circle jerk

So...you don't believe in democracy? That people involved, stakeholders, don't have a right to influence the direction of an organized effort?

Regardless of the lipid accumulation, they didn't comment at all in the arstechnica piece about how the energetics are different 2ATP per COH3- in McG vs 1.5 ATP per COH3- in Calvin and where the glycolate is coming from. The whole point was to comment on RUBISCO inefficiency which they did not do, and the McG pathway consumes more ATP per carbon fixed, which is kind of against the idea of fixing more carbon in the first place. I'm not sure how truly amazing this article is, given the energetics, the lack of comment on stoich comparisons, and the glaring error of not commenting at all about the source of the glycolate.