rabiezaater

joined 1 month ago
-49
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by rabiezaater@piefed.social to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

Not every platform on the fediverse has a downvote system, but those that do (Lemmy, piefed) are heading down a bad path, imo. Downvoting is one of the worst features of reddit, leading to dogpiling, group think, and silencing of minority viewpoints. I do see the value of it, on the surface, and if you want to enable it for yourself to allow certain posts to be downvoted for your own information, I think you should be allowed to do so, but having it set as default for all posts just leads to a toxic and conformist environment, which is what I thought the fediverse was trying to get away from.

[–] rabiezaater@piefed.social -1 points 2 weeks ago

Because an LLM based interface allows you to say "I want my feed to look like Instagram" and it will just make it happen without you needing to tweak it endlessly. It is really the biggest strength of AI based tech, allowing for plain language input for what would normally be a relatively complex procedure.

[–] rabiezaater@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

The app bugged out

[–] rabiezaater@piefed.social -5 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

People getting pissed off about an app that is basically just a UI wrapper, and has absolutely nothing to do with the actual platform itself, is just emblematic of the state of the anti-AI witch hunters. Literally do not use it if you don't like it, it's really that simple.

[–] rabiezaater@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The problem with just sending the request to the developers is that often times requests for improvements are dismissed as an annoyance. I have discussed many issues with the way the fediverse works over many years, and many responses are "just build the feature yourself if you want to see it". After years of never seeing these changes made, when you can just prompt an agent in an IDE to make the changes you want, it is hard not to take that route. Granted, if you are doing it for yourself or a small group of people who may be interested in using the changes you made, that is different from submitting AI generated code to an existing project. But I don't see anything inherently wrong with vibe coding solutions to problems, as long as you have a general understanding of what you're doing and how things work.

[–] rabiezaater@piefed.social 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] rabiezaater@piefed.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So are comments and dislikes apparently. I see 6 comments listed on this thread, but none are actually showing up at all.

[–] rabiezaater@piefed.social 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Good resource there on energy consumption, thanks for sharing. I had heard some things about the energy use being over stated, or over focused on, but that is a very comprehensive outline of exactly the overall impact.

[–] rabiezaater@piefed.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

I had been reading the anarchist faq well before I saw that movie. Still a good reference though.

 

I get some of the surface level reasons, and those annoy me too. Cramming AI into everything is dumb and unnecessary.

However, I do feel that at a deeper level, it has a lot of useful applications that will absolutely change society and improve the efficiency and skills of those who use it. For example, if someone wants to learn to code, they could take a few different paths. There are the traditional paths, just read or go to school and learn to code that way. Or you could pay for a bootcamp or an online coding education platform. Or, you could just tell an AI chatbot you want to learn to code, and have them become your teacher, and correct any errors you make in real time. Another application is in generating ideas or quick mock ups. Say I'm playing a game of d&d with friends. I need a character avatar so I just provide a description to the AI and it makes it up quick. It might take a few prompts, but it usually does a pretty good job. Or if I have a scenario I need to make a few enemies for, I could just provide the description of those enemies and have a quick stat block made up for them.

I realize that there are underlying issues with regard to training the AI on others work, but as someone who is a musician myself, and a supporter of open source as often as possible, I feel that it's a bit hypocritical for people to get upset about AI "stealing" work with regard to code or other stuff that people willingly put out there for free for others to consume. Any artist or coder could "steal" the work of others for inspiration for their work, the same as an AI does, an AI is just much more efficient about it. I do think that most of the corporations that are pushing some new AI feature or promising the world or end of the labor force is full of shit, and that we are definitely in some sort of an AI bubble, but the technology itself is definitely useful in a lot of ways, and if it can be developed on a more localized and decentralized scale (community owned AI hubs anyone?), it could actually be a really powerful and beneficial technology for organizations and individuals looking to do more with less.

view more: next ›