defiant

joined 2 years ago
[–] defiant@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

The restrictions on commercial use means it does not meet the non-discrimination part of the open source definition.

This blog post from the OSI explains it well: https://blog.opensource.org/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source/

[–] defiant@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Llama 2 is not open source. tech companies need to stop abusing the term.

[–] defiant@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

How many times can Elon shoot himself in the foot with Twitter before it dies