[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

this is why I never use ÷ (or more realistically "/") without explicit brackets denoting order of operations.

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 62 points 8 months ago

it's not thousands of years of context. All this stuff dates back to, like, roughly the 1900s. Basically the British Mandatory period.

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

Speaking as someone who does know what a homestuck fan is, you're 100% right.

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

The "as geography permits" part is a big obstacle, unfortunately.

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago

wait, the steam browser is chromium? no way

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Their proposal is that, when you visit a website using WEI, it doesn't let you see it right away. Instead, it first asks a third party if you're "legit", as opposed to maybe a bot or something.

The problem is, it would be really tricky to tell if you're "legit", because people get very, very tricky and clever with their bots (not to mention things like content farms, which aren't even bots, they're real humans, just doing the same job as a bot would). So, in order to try to do their jobs at all, these kind of third parties would have to try to find out a whole bunch of stuff about you.

Now, websites already try to do that, but for now the arms race is actually on our side; the end user has more or less full control over what code a website can run on their browser (which is how extensions like u-block and privacy badger work).

But if the end user could just block data collection, the third-party is back to square one. How can they possibly verify ("attest") that you aren't sus, if you're preventing all attempts at collecting data about yourself, or your device / operating system / browser / etc?

The answer is, they can't. So, to do a proper attestation, they have to have a whole bunch of information about you. And if they can't, they logically have no way of knowing if you're a bot. And if that's the case, when the third-party reports that back to the website you're trying to visit, they'll assume you're a bot, and block you. Obviously.

That's pretty much my understanding of the situation. In order to actually implement this proposal, it would require unprecedented invasive measures for data collection; and for people who try to block it, they might just end up being classified as "bots" and basically frozen out of major parts of the internet. Especially because, when you consider how people can essentially just use whatever hardware and software they want, it would be in these big companies' interests to restrict consumer choice to only the hardware and software they deem acceptable. Basically, it's a conflict of interest, especially because the one trying to push this on everyone is Google themselves.

Now, Google obviously denies all that. They assure us it won't be used for invasive data collection, that people will be able to opt out without losing access to websites, that there won't be any discrimination against anyone's personal choice of browser/OS/device/etc.

But it's bullshit. They're lying. It's that shrimple.

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 55 points 11 months ago

They make them money because:

  • they use reddit
  • spez gets some nice usage stats to show off
  • as a direct consequence, advertisers keep paying to put their ads
  • also as a direct consequence, investors' confidence in reddit continues to recover; there's a real possibility that, when it IPOs, it will actually go for a decent price

Now, if enough people go commit ad-block, and advertisers somehow become wise to that fact... then maybe it will hurt reddit's bottom line (at which point spez will start trying to emulate youtube's anti-ad stuff).

But as it stands, especially if most of reddit's usage is through reddit's mobile app... I'm not really sure how you can block ads there.

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 78 points 11 months ago
  • matrix isn't a fediverse thing, it's its own thing. it does happen to be decentralized, like the fediverse.

  • matrix isn't an alternative to discord. it's an alternative to whatsapp/signal/telegram/etc.

  • matrix is nice (I use it with my friend group), but it's not perfect. we're looking for something better.

  • if you're looking for a decentralized, self-hosted, open-source, secure alternative for discord, my friends and I use Mumble. It works great for VoIP (and its noise cancellation software actually seems to work noticeably better than Discord's), but it doesn't really have the advanced text chat features that Discord does. We make do with Matrix.

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

incredibly based. fuck the execs. fucking parasites

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

they're on that sigma onlyfans grindset, ofc they're winning

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

No, the correct answer is "fuck both of them". You don't need Twitter, you definitely don't need Threads.

You don't even need Mastodon for that matter. You don't need a constant drip feed of dopamine. If you need to stay informed, you can just use news sites or something.

[-] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Petition to replace cringe ageism with based classism (against the rich)

view more: next ›

complacent_jerboa

joined 11 months ago