How is being genocided without restraint better than being genocided without restraint?

There is no better or worse in actively arming and participating in a genocide.

I'm not the one murdering them, quite literally. Just like in real life, there is no mystical unstoppable force of nature in play. It's another person, like you. Their choices aren't your choices.

To put it another way, if you sold a kid a bike and he later crashes and dies despite the bike having no faults, are you responsible? Most would correctly identify that you are not responsible in that scenario, as the kid is responsible for what they did with the bike.

There already has been no restraint from Biden. Genocide is genocide, and Harris supports genocide.

I'm not voting for genocide, there is no moral argument to do so.

I'm not ever going to vote for a genocide, and there is no moral high ground if you do .

Well of the two candidates, Harris actually receives untraceable funding, and no Russian funds have been linked to stein.

Democrats have no interest in democracy or anything that weakens their corporate power, like rcv/star/democratic voting methods.

I don't think any undecided voters are going to be moved by Michelle Obama, the definition of "only mildly appealing to center right wine moms as a vague topic of conversation."

The man who appointed Hitler wasn't a fascist.

I voted PSL, enjoy literally being a member of the Nazi party.

I'm not voting for genocide. In fact I already voted against genocide.

The Dems nor Republicans have a candidate that is against genocide.