Yes, and the AI threat is also worse than everything mentioned in this article. The quote from the researcher at the very start is apt and should be taken 100% seriously.
But I don't understand yours in light of what I have explained.
I don't see what the contradiction is in what I said there and my other comment.
In a world where everything is done better and easier by machines I have a hard time imagining people wanting to spend years of their life learning how to program, how to paint, how to make furniture, how to do science and so on. Hardly anyone makes complicated software in assembly code now that we have higher level programming languages. Hardly any farmers don't use machinery. Hardly anyone mills grain by hand. People in developed countries don't wash their clothes by hand. People don't do things that we can now automate. Those things that everyone used to do now feel like way too much hard work. So I don't understand why you would think people would still break their backs to do productive things when others are getting better results by asking a robot to do it.
even if we get to that point technologically
We're pretty much already there. We have robots. They have AI. Most jobs aren't that complicated - a good proportion could probably be replaced by robots with small improvements in dexterity, predictability and human interaction. Robots just need to become cheaper to make and run which market competition, mass production and nuclear power will gleefully enable.
capitalists have no workers to steal surplus value from
They don't need to get value from human workers, they can get that from robots. Money is only a means to goods and services. Robots can make the goods and provide the services. Lower class people won't be needed at all. Even the purchases can mainly be done by the wealthy and businesses. Lower class people will not only be uneccessary but entirely non-beneficial to this economy. The only reason those in power might have to keep them around is to inflate their egos by making them prostrate in exchange for their UBI.
No I'm not. Here's a good explanation of how technological progress has been accelerating. You could also look up the law of accelerating returns.
Interesting thanks!
Where did I say otherwise?
You may not need external pressure for some things but you still need motivation. And I think motivation would be very rare in a society where everything can be done by robots with a simple request.
I think it's quite obvious that for someone to do something that they know will take a lot of effort they will need some motivation to do it. Anybody who did anything did it out of necessity, some perceived benefit to someone or some personal interest in doing it. Nobody ever dug a hole for no reason unless they were extremely bored and had nothing else to keep them occupied but a shovel and some dirt.
https://www.instructables.com/How-to-Build-a-High-Speed-Centrafuge/
Only necessary for filtering used oil, however
Moore's law is one example but hardly the only one