@Passerby6497 yes I’ve been told as much 😅
https://lemmy.world/comment/18919678
Jokes aside, I understand this was the point. I just wanted to make the point that it is feasible, if not currently economically viable
GuillaumeRossolini
joined 2 years ago
@rtxn all right, that’s all you had to say initially, rather than try convincing me that the network client was out of the loop: it isn’t, that’s the whole point of Anubis
@rtxn validation of what?
This is a typical network thing: client asks for resource, server says here’s a challenge, client responds or doesn’t, has the correct response or not, but has the challenge regardless
@AEMarling yes thank you
B&N don’t seem to agree with themselves whether my order went through or was cancelled, but they’ll sort it out 🤣
@AEMarling never mind the point is moot, I didn’t realize that B&N were unable to deliver ebooks to people not physically located in the US 🙃
@AEMarling hi! I imagine it’s early to ask about translations? I’m comfortable reading English but as a gift, I’d need French/Spanish
@rikudou @voxel
ASFAIR it used to be even worse than that, because if you didn’t want SNI (for compatibility reasons or whatever), but you still wanted a certificate, you had to have one server for every hostname (because each had its own IP), assuming you could afford the additional IP space
Granted you didn’t need a physical server, but that was still a bigger cost
Some servers are more flexible on that front, but early SNI didn’t have those
view more: next ›
@mfed1122 yeah that is my worry, what’s an acceptable wait time for users? A tenth of a second is usually not noticeable to a human, but is it useful in this context? What about half a second, etc
I don’t know that I want a web where everything is artificially slowed by a full second for each document