130
submitted 3 months ago by Tekkip20@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

What's your favourite to use? Mine is Fish due to its ease of use and user friendly approach.

Bash is the pepperoni of shell tools being reliable in every field no matter what but I've moved to Fish as I wanted to try something different.

So what's your shell of choice?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Slowly trying to learn sh while using mostly bash. Convenience is nice and all, but when I encounter something like OpenWRT or Android, I don't like the feeling of speaking a foreign language. Maybe if I can get super familiar with sh, then I might explore prettier or more convenient options, but I really want to know how to deal with the most universal shell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I've recently migrated to nushell, I don't straight up recommend it because it's not POSIX compliant, so unless you're already familiar with some other she'll I would not use it.

That being said, it's an awesome shell if you deal with structured data constantly, and that's something I do quite often so for me it's a great tool.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

Just looking at it briefly it looks a lot like PowerShell, any reason to use it over PowerShell?

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Never used PowerShell, so I didn't know that it was available for Linux nor open source, since from a quick search both of them seem to be true I guess there's no real reason since both are described very similarly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JRepin@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Bash is my favourite one, second to it being Fish

[-] TheV2@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

I use mainly fish and occasionally nushell.

[-] sntx@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago
[-] DarkNoul@feddit.nl 4 points 3 months ago
[-] Ferk@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Bash. By default it might seem less featureful than zsh.. but bash is a lot more powerful and extensible than some give it credit for. It might be more complex to set it up the way you like it, but once you do it, that configuration can be ported over wherever bash exists (ie. almost everywhere).

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Bash, zshell, BusyBox....you don't really need anything else

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

zsh because I've been using it since college and I don't like change

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

I have been enjoying fish a lot over the last few months, but I generally try to use Bash, it makes cross-*NIX administration that much easier.

[-] vipaal@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Bash as it is what I'm most familiar with. Having an eye out on the https://amber-lang.com/ that compiles to bash for future scripting purposes.

[-] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

Zsh with powerlevel10k + a few plugins

[-] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Bash, just because everything else already uses it. That and bashisms have infected nearly all of my scripts as I clumsily bump into the limitations of POSIX string manipulation.

I have found some very fun things with sed branching patterns as a result of these limitations though...

https://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/html_node/Branching-and-flow-control.html

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

POSIX on servers, thinking of switching to POSIX on desktop but that's a bit awkward

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

PowerShell, with zsh being a close second

[-] moreeni@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Feeling risky today, eh? Mind sharing the reasoning behind your extravagant choice?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ving_thor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

zsh with grml config because I'm too lazy to make my own config.

[-] somethingsomethingidk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Bash is my login shell, but I have fish set as the default shell for alacritty

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

PowerShell, because of autocomplete and shift+arrows select.

[-] Tovervlag@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

I often end up in ps because I'm more familiar with it. But only if I have to do some scripting or so.

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 1 points 3 months ago

Zsh on workstations. Bash on servers.

[-] MerryChyrsler@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

At the moment I'm using zsh with powerlevel10k. But powerlevel10k is not really supported anymore, and seems to be basically on life support. While it still works for now, I have been thinking of switching over to fish. But the lack of posix compatibility is holding me back a bit.

[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Powershell, but heavily customized.

[-] Tovervlag@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

Why the downvotes? Ps is pretty good and it works well on Linux too.

[-] loppy@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Red_sun_in_the_sky@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I used zsh, urxvt and konsole. I do prefer zsh. Urxvt is nice too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
130 points (97.1% liked)

Linux

47485 readers
938 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS