20

But that’s why it’s so nice that there are some gems who actually have scientifically backed formulations, or even better: contribute to science by doing studies and creating new categories!

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] agissilver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

P&G does some interesting anti-aging research involving genetics. I saw a talk about it some years ago when I was in chemistry graduate school.

SK-II is therefore probably legit but it's too expensive for me.

[-] akrz@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

you just sent me down a 30 min google spiral hahah, thank you for the tip!

[-] Alanjaow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Aren't the majority of skin care things (and makeup) tested on animals though?

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

In regards to safety, yes. They have to make sure you don't develop a rash or something. Good thing there are regulations for that, otherwise at least some companies would try without that, too.

[-] akrz@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

i mean if it is required for safety reasons then that's okay imo

[-] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It's not required though, many companies do just fine without the testing on animals while still being compliant.

[-] akrz@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Often those companies just use ingredients and formulations that have been tested on animals by other companies and the patent has run out/it is not patented. Companies doing animal testing probably would not do animal testing on such products too. Most companies try to avoid costs.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

SkincareAddiction

787 readers
1 users here now

A lemmy community for skincare enthusiasts.

Some ground-rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS