122
A good way to make your queer employees feel like their "comfort levels" don't matter. I guess only bigots matter at this school.
Oh yeah I bet they always make sure to make their employees comfortable and not just the times when they can do it for free by excluding people.
Can't have your children learning from people who are different from you.
"respect people with sticks up their asses."
There, fixed it, ya soulless dregs. Couldn't put a little colour in your life even. That would be too much.
Right? I'm straight as an arrow but in no way would a drag queen at work do anything but brighten my day a bit.
Had a friend take me out to a gay bar, there was a drag competition and let me just say this, those motherfuckers can party. Had a great time.
Love how they cancelled the event hours before it was scheduled. Seems like they didn't "respect the comfort levels" of the event organizers, participants, and most notably, Harmonica Sunbeam.
Fuck Brookdale.
They literally cancelled the event, but the cons aren't for cancel culture.
“Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” – Leo Tolstoy
I'm not comfortable around bigots, Laura.
I bet none of the students feel comfortable about paying the high tuition.
To protect the right wing snowflakes.
For optimal functionality on NJ.com, please disable your ad blocker before continuing
Nope!
Was this event mandatory?
Completely optional
I'm kinda mixed about this. Not against drag queens. But just at work entertainment in general.
If a company hired a bunch of comedian podcasters who lean hard into anti-woke territory, I'd be pretty peeved. I wouldn't attend, but I'd be annoyed that company dollars went to that.
I went to a workplace event at the shooting range and remember the vegans being pissed at the idea we can shoot photos of animals. Totally understand their perspective.
And another time, I went to a work event where the main event was to watch classic cowboy movies and I noped because those movies bore me.
Not really sure of the answer. Maybe workplace events are just impossible to satisfy anybody.
Agreed. We've had lots of "team building" types of things that might have otherwise been fun (and mostly were), but ours always get turned into something super-competitive. It can't be just "get out and do something as a group", it has to have a set of winners. So our activities always get skewed to something like that. So the actual activity is the very opposite of "team building".
But I guess thing is that the very idea of a "team" at work is total bullshit anyway, at least as far as any company I've ever worked for. Ever notice people don't get compensated as a team? Hell, people don't even know how others are compensated and if the "team" has a success, it's not usually as if they all share in the rewards equally, or even merit-based. It's all gut-feel, combined with who has what title, no matter how much time/effort someone puts in. So someone who was only just added to a "team" weeks before a major initiative is finished gets showered with praise, money, benefits - if they are an executive or at least have the right title/relationship with people making such decisions.
I think workplace events (or offsite ones) just tend to annoy nearly everyone in the actual trenches, if you want to be honest. Add in something that is political in nature and I think it only gets worse.
I mean, did employees have to attend? No? Well, then what was the problem?
Dude they PARTY hard AF
There was a bar pretty close where i live, where on a good saturday had maybe 10 people max. Once a year they hosted a drag queen show party whatever. You had to buy tickets in advance or you wouldn't have any chance to get it. The bar was packed to the brim and it was always a blast. The obvious downside were the right wing cunts threatening to burn down the building every year.
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
122 points (94.9% liked)
politics
19223 readers
2956 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS