338
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] slowroll@r.nf 7 points 7 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I believe the first paragraph except colonizing space, at least not without hundreds of years of new technology at the human pace of invention.

We humans cannot even minimally adequately care for one another or this habitat, the one we evolved from, the most accommodating, self-correcting(to a point), resilient habitat that humanity will EVER know by far, and we've been fucking this easy situation up like breathing. Earth isn't even the "enter your name" part of the interstellar civilization test, that would be colonizing our local moon. No, failing the Earth test is basically taking the test to the bathroom assuming it to be toilet paper.

Everything else in non-multigenerational reach will be completely and totally unforgiving. Even in the best circumstances, one person going stir crazy if we're talking about sending real people can literally get everyone else killed, one major failure everybody dead, one major accident everybody dead.

Sorry, I know most of us are deluded into believing salvation comes from reckless attempts at ready fire aim growth, but if we don't get this world fully squared away from the consequences of our reckless actions, find homeostasis and successfully meet the needs of the humans here on easy mode Earth, the idea that we can make colonies of hundreds or thousands on our Moon/Titan/Mars is a bad joke.

We can send 5-20 HIGHLY TRAINED perfect specimens to Mars or Titan to plant a flag and grow potatoes for a few years, and I'm all for that as a human rallying achievement, we really need one of those, but that isn't the same thing as developing a true, sustainable presence on another world. We'll have either long since decimated this habitat or pulled out a miracle of finding equilibrium with it long before we're ready for that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

And in order to achieve it we need to get rid of some dipshit CEOs

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 7 months ago

It's very rational, it's always been mocked and looked down upon to be optimistic. But through the ages it has been proven to be true that we achieve much more than we imagine.

However the pessimism built in to most people probably helps this drive and is actually a good thing.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

Is that new reality going to end up being a shinier version of Office Space for everyone, everywhere, forever?

If so you can keep all that shit.

[-] daikiki@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

If it weren't for the thieving class and the people who fall for their bullshit, I'm convinced we'd be having serious discussions about what it means to live in a post-scarcity society by now.

[-] thinkyfish@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't disagree with any of these things, we just don't know when they will come to be and its going to be a rough ride. Old and new systems fighting, the history and the future all happening at once. We are experiencing something that has never happened to any species on earth, or maybe in the entire universe ever, so we're flying blind, ready or not.

[-] THE_ANTIHERO@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] theodewere@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

he wants to live inside his computer

[-] ULS@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Hopium. There's far too much "evil" force in this world for there to ever be an edan or unity. Overall chaos is what got us to our current state of humanity. Chaos will always be.

Don't read that as me saying humans are shit though. It's more like humans don't want to take their lack of "power" seriously. Which is natural or whatever... I know it all sounds negative, but I don't mean for it to sound negative. Chaos is the only constant, order comes from it, but chaos is always dominant from the present moment to the future. You can't stop the universe, including human society from changing and growing. You can learn about it and create from it but it always owns you. No matter who you are.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

None of the things mentioned here that we could achieve would require an absence of evil or need the whole world to cooperate. Hell we've been doing the last one for quite some time in the form of books, movies and video games.

[-] Daqu@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Monorail! Monorail! Monorail!

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

It's a character flaw called "wishful belief" - that is, failure to distinguish between what you predict that'll happen and what you hope that'll happen.

[-] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
338 points (89.9% liked)

Technology

59081 readers
3019 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS